Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: We Have a Scroll of Secrets!!

The core of the Oral Law is encoded in the mishnayos collected and culled and edited into their final form by R' Yehuda. Collected, culled, and edited from where? There is a large body of statements that were used as the core curriculum in the ancient yeshivos of Eretz Yisroel. R' Yehuda produced from there the six orders of the mishna that is the official set of statements used by the entire Jewish nation. There are also other collections, authoritative in content, but not as well known nor are well studied. These are known as ברייתות; which literally means "outside teaching", as they are outside the office cannon of mishnayos. The gemara often uses them to clarify and deepen our understanding of a topic. The gemara (Shabbos 6b) is curious about why a ברייתא makes two quite obvious claims in one breath:
Were someone to move an object between a private and public domain on Shabbos; if it was by accident, they have to bring a sin offering, but if it was on purpose, then it is a capital crime punishable by spiritual excision done without witnesses and warning, and stoning otherwise.

The bothersome issue here is that this is true for any transgression of one of the 39 forbidden labors of Shabbos. The gemara makes a couple of half-hearted attempts, then brings out the big guns. Rav says he found the Scroll of Secrets from the Yeshiva of R' Chiya and it says in there: איסי בן יהודה says there are one less than 40 categories of forbidden labor on Shabbos, and the transgression of only one of them is a capital crime. The gemara says, basically... whoa!! that can't be right! So the gemara demurs and emends the statement to be:  איסי בן יהודה says there are one less than 40 categories of forbidden labor on Shabbos, and the transgression of all of them is a capital crime, except one. (which is left unidentified). (Trust me -- or not, you can check it yourself -- those statements are much more similar in Babylonian Aramaic.) The gemara concludes... Ah! That explains it! The ברייתא  is coming to tell us that the labor of transferring from one domain to another is not a candidate for the unidentified labor that is not punishable as a capital crime; transferring an object from one domain to another is definitely punishable as a capital crime. We feel much better. Two dots.

Sounds more than a bit Harry Potter-ish, no? Secret scrolls. Cryptic messages about life and death matters. So cool! I wanted to delve into this more, so I went downstairs, where the yeshiva has an Otzer HaHochma! Thousands of s'farim digitized and computer searchable. So I searched. I found 100s of entries and dozens of very detailed articles on this topic. Real stuff. M'iri, S'fas Emes, Chidushei Shevet HaLevi, and more! I have spent six hours poring through sources over the last two days.

I cannot possibly summarize what I found in one TftD. However, I'll whet your appetite. The M'iri says the category of labor whose transgression is not a capital crime is making a fire. How does we know? Because the verse at the beginning of parasha VaYakel says to not make a fire in all of your dwelling places on Shabbos (Shmos 35:3). Why was "making a fire" singled out from all the labors? One opinion is to tell us that making a fire is not a capital crime; another opinion is to tell us that one must atone (bring an offering) for each category of labor that was violated, not just one for the whole Shabbos. So the M'iri says that איסי בן יהודה meant fire. We, however, hold according to the other opinion. The final halacha, therefore, is that transgression of any and all categories of labor on Shabbos is a capital offence.

There are strong questions on this M'iri. And what is a scroll of secrets anyway? Stay tuned...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...