Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Permission to Question -- Lowering Science from TRUE to Plausible

My son-in-law the NCSY rabbi provided me with an incredible opportunity for failure.  The task sounds simple enough, just speak on the topic of science and Torah.  Three aspects of the job transformed the task from something I always enjoy into the 11th labor of Hercules.
  1. This was a group of teenagers.
  2. They had been brainwashed by the public school system that science is True and Torah is (at best) a beautiful tradition.
  3. They were teenagers.
We decided, therefore, not to attempt to convince them that Torah is True, but simply that science it not.  Again, not that science is false, just that it's not True.

There were 20 or so teenagers; I specifically did not stand in front of them at a podium, but sat with them.  I started with a modified presentation of Pascal's wager.  Instead of couching it in philosophical terms, I asked them to imagine going to a carnival that has two games.  They can only play one of them; in fact, they must play one of them.  Both games cost a dollar to play.  Game A: if you lose, you lose your dollar; if you win, you get $1,000.  Game B: if you win you get nothing (playing the game is its own reward); if you lose you have to pay $1,000.  Even though they were all teenagers and therefore programmed to give whatever answer you don't want; they all agreed that game A would be their choice.  So far, so good.

So I asked them, "Since that is the essence of Pascal's argument to be christian; why aren't you all christian?"  At this point my son-in-law broke into a cold sweat; "Umm... we are not suggesting you consider that as a possibility; right, Abba?"  That got them smiling and after some discussion, they were led to the conclusion that you can only play a game that exists.  Since they believed science was True, it simply wasn't rational to contemplate anything else.  They saw the logic of that (whew!) and were now ready to hear the arguments that science may not, in fact, be the end all and be all of Truth.

We structured the discussion around three pillars of support for science: evolution (it ain't science), age of the universe (things are not always as they appear), and the contradiction of free will vs divine providence (this is even worse for science, so not a discriminator).  It was a very lively discussion and I knew they were really involved when I heard one of them comment, "Wow!  This is even more fun than TV!"

I knew we were on track when one young man raised his hand to ask, quite incredulously, "Wait.  Are you saying that you don't believe in evolution?"  Since I had established my credentials and demonstrated that I really did know science, they did not shut down when I answered, "I think evolution is nonsense."  I knew that we had achieved our goal, however, when another said, "Ok; we've heard lots of disproofs of science.  Where's the proof of Torah?"  Once you invite Torah in, there's no going back.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...