Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: A Deep Dive into T'vila

I said that I don't know how some people got the idea they could use keili that requires t'vila once before toveling (Toveling Keilim on Shabbos).  I didn't mean that I had no inkling of how such a preposterous rumor got started, I just meant that I didn't know with certainty.  Several people commented to me that they knew, and all said basically the same idea.  Still, I wasn't completely convinced till one person told me that Facebook had conducted a survey of 100 people, and that's the answer they all gave.  I didn't even know you could run a survey on Facebook and I was shocked to learn that this chaver of mine even knew that much about Facebook.

Still and all... good enough proof for me.  So know I know; it is a misconception about disposable aluminum pans.  Let's get some facts and debunk this myth.

To require t'vila, an object must be:
  1. A halachic keili.  The term "keili" is very broad.  Of course it includes kitchen utensils, tools, and appliances; but it also includes clothing.  It is something that has a function and can be used multiple times to perform that function; that is, it is not consumed by its usage.  That means, for example, that cloth diapers are keilim, but disposable diapers are not.  Handkerchiefs are keilim; facial tissue (oh for goodness sakes, we both know I mean kleenex) are not.  Paper cups are questionable, which is why you don't want to make kiddush or wash for a bread meal using one.
  2. Made of metal (d'oraisa) or glass (d'rabanan).  Metal is learned from the Torah's description of what was done after Klal Yisrael, b'ezras HaShem, whupped the Midianites (Bamidbar 31:21-24).  Glass is a similar material in that it can melted and reformed, so Chazal decreed that glass keilim require t'vila whenever metal would.  Aluminum is of questionable status in halacha; so an aluminum keili that would require t'vila if it were made of metal or glass should preferably be immersed with something else that definitely requires t'vila.
  3. Used for tzorchei s'uda -- meal necessities.  Of course that includes pots, pans, and utensils.  It also includes serving trays and coffee pots.
  4. Was once (while satisfying above three conditions) owned by a goy, and is now owned by a Jew.
Let's start easy.  I have two glasses that used to be jam jars. They happen to be the perfect size for my morning orange juice (with lots of pulp Mrs. C), and I have never toveled them.  Not because I am an avarian (in this matter, anyway), but because they started their life as disposable packaging for jam.  After the jam was used up, I decided that I would keep them and convert them into juice glasses.  That means that when they started their lives, they satisfied neither (1) (not a keili) nor (3) (not for tzorchei s'uda).  I changed their status, so by the time they satisfied (1) and (3) they were already owned by a Jew; hence  they do not satisfy (4)

How about (so-called) disposable aluminum pans?  If I plan to throw them out after the first use, then they don't satisfy (1) and so I may cook with them, serve from them (we're very informal at home), refrigerate what's left in them, rewarm them, serve them again, refrigerate the leftovers again, warm them again, eat them myself (my wife is not touching anything that's been rewarmed twice), and then finally dispose of them in the blue recycle bin; all without toveling them.  If, however, I plan to wash them out and reuse (disposable my eye!  these things are expensive!)  them for cooking, or additional storage in the fridge, or as serving dishes; then I must tovel them before even the first use.

Just to be absolutely clear: either I never have to tovel them, or I must tovel them before even the first use.

Regarding aluminum pans in my house.  I am a cheapskate and always plan to reuse them.  My  wife is practical and always plans to throw them out.  So I tovel them (lots at one time) with a new shot glass or knife.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...