Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Knowing Vs. Believing It's Great to Exist

R' Noach Weinberg, z"tzl, in his 48 ways lectures proved that we are woefully decadent.  He would ask, "What's the opposite of pain?"  The answer was invariably, "Pleasure!"  "Wrong," he would say, "The opposite of pain is comfort.  You are all saying your greatest pleasure is to be comfortable.  That's decadent."  His demonstration that pain and pleasure are not opposites?  Every parent knows that his greatest source of pain and pleasure is one and the same: junior(s).

For two and one half years, Chazal (Eiruvin 13b) tells us, the debate raged: no'ach lo l'adam sh'nivra o sh'lo nivrah?  This statement is usually mistranslated to say something ludicrous; so I shan't even repeat it.  In any question that involves a side of "had not been created", one must be wary that much bigger things are going on here than meet the eye.  Another problem is the word "no'ach".  In this context, it means something like "more comfortable", or "less distressing".  So the debate was something like whether it would have been more comfortable/less distressing not to have been created.  Hmm... seems like a funny question; why should I care whether being created was comfortable or distressing?  There is no goal to be comfortable or less stressed.  The goal is simple to earn one's way to olam ha'bah.

Their conclusion -- "no'ach sh'lo nivrah" --  doesn't seem to help clarify why Chazal spent two and one half years of their precious time discussing this.  Wait!  They had an add on: now that you have been created, sort out your bad from good (m'fashfesh) actions; other says, improve the quality (m'mashmesh) your actions.  Well... that certainly clears things up now, doesn't it?  Uh... no, not really.

R' Yisrael Salanter (as explained by Michtav mei'Eliyahu) explains that everyone knows intellectually/in principle that it is a tremendous give of infinite good that we we created.  The question on the table was whether one can come to a concrete belief and appreciation of that reality, or is it always going to have to be just taken on faith?  Moreover, if I can't make that real to myself, how do I avoid total despair at my guaranteed inability to reach the ultimate goal of perfection?

Chazal took a vote and concluded that "no'ach lo sh'lo nivrah"; you are never going to be able to move beyond that final, blind leap of faith that it really, really is all good.  How do you avoid despair?  Look at your actions.  When you are first starting, you are tossing out a lot of bad... take pride in that!  When you have reached a point where you feel good about your actions, look at them and improve them... and take more pride in that.  Repeat.

You can't reach perfection on your own.  You don't need to.  The One Who gave you existence loves you and will give you all the help you need.  You do your part; He'll do His.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...