Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Using Science in Support of Avodas HaShem

I have talked and written a lot about bad science.  I want to be absolutely clear that I have nothing at all against science as a method of investigation.  I don't even have a problem with people who use scientific data and models to support their own agenda.  The entire Sha'ar B'china of Chovos HaL'vavos is precisely that; using a critical scientific investigation of the world around us to become more aware and more inspired by the wisdom of the Creator.

For example, consider the circulatory system of the developing embryo.  In a baby living out here in the world, blood flows from the body to the right upper chamber of the heart, from right upper chamber to right lower chamber, from right lower chamber to lungs, from lungs to left upper chamber of heart, from left upper chamber to left lower chamber, from left lower chamber to the body; round and round she goes.  This is, of course, the circulation that will continue throughout the person's life from new born infant to goseis; cradle to grave, as it were.

In an embryo, however, things are different; very, very different.  First of all, while the heart begins functioning at approximately four weeks into gestation, the lungs are not ready till near term.  Secondly, nutrients and oxygen come from the placenta, which is outside the embryo's body.  The heart cannot pump blood into the not yet existent lungs, so there is a hole between the right an left upper chambers to shunt blood straight across.  The blood flow must travel out of the body to the placenta (via the umbilical cord), which means the circulation in the embryo is opposite to the flow it will have in the baby.  How much time does it take to switch from embryonic flow to crying baby?  One breath.  Not billions of years and countless happy accidents.  One breath.

That's inspiring!

What I do have a problem with -- a big problem that may sometimes sound like a chip on my shoulder kind of problem -- is people who misappropriate scientific data and models to support their own hidden agenda.

The reason I get on my high horse about this issue is that my grandfather (my mother's father), may he rest in peace, taught me a deep respect (verging on reverence) for intellectual honesty in general, and the scientific process in particular.  My grandfather was not religious, but was completely open minded to any true evidence.  He told me once that he was not an atheist, because atheists believe that G-d does not exist; since it is impossible to prove the non-existence of G-d, he rejected their dogma as illogical.  Moreover, he told me, he couldn't even call himself agnostic; agnostics don't know if G-d exists, but further claim that that the can't know.  He didn't know if he could know or not, so he again rejected their dogma as illogical.

I took that lesson to heart and spent years looking for the proof or disproof of the existence of G-d.  Had my grandfather had access to the same data that I have, I believe he would have reached the same conclusion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…