Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Prayer is Not a Response to Crisis; Prayer Seeks Crisis

At the beginning of parshas Toldos (Bereishi 25:21) we are told:

וַיֶּעְתַּ֨ר יִצְחָ֤ק לַֽיהֹוָה֙ לְנֹ֣כַח אִשְׁתּ֔וֹ כִּ֥י עֲקָרָ֖ה הִ֑וא וַיֵּעָ֤תֶר לוֹ֙ ה' וַתַּ֖הַר רִבְקָ֥ה אִשְׁתּֽוֹ

This can be translated as: And Yitzchak prayed to the Lord opposite his wife because she was barren, and the Lord accepted his prayer, and Rivka his wife conceived. To really understand this verse, we need to add some words, and read: And both Yitzchak and Rivka prayed to the Lord, with Isaac on one side opposite his wife. They were praying because she was barren; and the Lord accepted his prayer, and Rivka -- his wife -- conceived.

R' Bachya notes that the Torah orders events by cause first, followed by effect; making the cause the main thing and the effects as subordinates to the cause. Therefore, says R' Bachya, this verse is telling us: Yitzchak was davening, so his wife, Rivka, davened across from him, and so she was barren, and so HaShem overturned nature (that's really what 'וַיֵּעָ֤תֶר לוֹ֙ הֹ means), and so Rivka, his wife, conceived. That is, HaShem so loves the prayers of the Avos that He made three of the matriarchs barren.

What does that mean? R' Bachya goes on to explain why each of the matriarchs had to wait so long for children anyway. Sarah's conceiving needed to be delayed so that: (1) Yishmael could be born; and (2) so that her name could be changed to contain a  ה -- which was necessary because HaShem created the world with a ה (B'reishis 2:4, Rashi there, second explanation), so the addition ה to Avraham and Sarah demonstrates that Klal Yisrael is above nature. Rivka's conceiving had to be delayed so that Avraham would leave this world before Eisav went off to his evil ways. (The day that Avraham died, Esav went out to murder, commit adultery, and avodah zarah.) Rachel's conceiving needed to be delayed to bring out the tribes of Dan, Naftali, Gad, and Asher from Bilhah and Zilpah.

What does all that mean? Of course, I don't really know; but I'll give it the ole college try. Because of (at least) what was mentioned above, the delay in the matriarchs giving birth was inevitable; all part of the master plan. HaShem could have just told them that, just as He told Avraham that his descendants would be enslaved in a foreign nation and then emerge with great wealth -- both materialistically and be receiving the Torah. Just as He told Yaakov that he would be returning from Lavan's house. Just as He has told us that Eretz Yisrael is our home land. Instead, HaShem left them in the dark with the knowledge that (for the time being) they could not conceive.

Why would HaShem leave them in the dark? So they would daven with more passion with more love for HaShem (see Parshas Lech Lecha, B'reishis 12:2, and Rashi there). Because HaShem loves our תפילות.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo