Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: A Choice Between Two Mincha Minyanim

For various reasons, I would prefer to daven mincha g'dola; that is, soon after is it time to daven mincha, instead of right before sh'kiya. I recently discovered there are two mincha g'dola minyamin near my "office", aka home. One offers a full mincha -- silent shmone esrei followed by the reader's repetition... but no tachanun. The other offers tachanun, but does a "heiche k'dusha". Follow link to OU site provided for complete explanation and history.

Both options are less than optimal. Before getting to the p'sak halacha, though, I think it is very important to appreciate that both of these customs -- which seem to fly in the face of halacha -- are practiced by kosher congregations around the world. Moreover, they have been practiced for some time and are not "new inventions." How they got started is one question. But the fact that they are both kosher and reputable now is indisputable.

Here is the lore I have heard about heicha k'dusha -- it is common in yeshivos and Lakewood style community kollels. The idea is that the was originally instituted before sidurim were available and many people didn't know how to daven by heart, so the shalich tzibur -- aka shatz -- would say the entire shmone esrei out loud to enable the congregation to fulfill their obligation. Nowadays that we all know how to daven (we all have siddurim), so there is less/different need for the reader's repetition and when time is short one may use the heicha k'dusha. Why do yeshivas and kollels use it even when time is not short? Some say to make an impression of the importance of learning Torah and to squeeze out every available second. Be that as it may (or not), the reason now is because it has become a custom.

What about skipping tachanun? Some say because mincha as in some/many chassidishe shuls started later, which meant that by the time they got to the part of the mincha where they should say tachanun, it was already too late. We don't say tachanun at night, you see. I have also heard that they intentionally pushed mincha later so that it would be too late for tachanun because tachanun is such a powerful t'fila, but arouses HaShem's trait of strict justice -- they feared that, so pushed mincha later. Be that as it may (or not), the reason now is because it has become a custom.

So what do I do when faced with a quandary such as this? You know the answer to that. R' Fuerst said it was better to daven where they do a full silent shmone esrei followed by the reader's repetition and miss tachanun.

You know me, I asked a follow up question: Am I allowed to say tachanun myself, or is that separating myself from the congregation? (A grave sin itself.) R' Fuerst told me I could say it myself after aleinu. (A chiddush to me, as it's place is really directly after shmone esrei.) Then I asked a final follow up question: Should I say it after aleinu? On that, I was told -- no the custom is not to say it, so you have no obligation. (I know the rabbi said "no obligation"; but I didn't tell you that answer in a vacuum, I told you the question to which that was the response.) So... I shall be planning to daven at the mincha g'dola minyan that has full silent shmone esrei followed by the reader's repetition and no tachanun.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...