Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: What You Can't Do WIth What Kind of Meat and What Kind of Milk

My granddaughter (three years old and very verbal) got a fish a couple of weeks ago.  If you can get away with it, they are a great way to "give in" to children who want a pet; apparently her parents got away with it.  Fish are neither cute nor cuddly; they are basically animated plants.  You might not think so, but that's actually a big advantage.  The day after she got the fish, it died.  Avigayil, however, was excited that her fish was so talented: "Look, Mommy; he is swimming upside down!"  Mommy and Tatty smiled and then switched in a new fish.  Avigayil is naive, but not stupid, after all.

The Torah tells us three times, "lo s'vashel g'di b'chaleiv imo" - Thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother's milk.  (Want references?  Don't be so lazy, just do what I would do; google it.  Sheesh.)  Why three times?  Everyone knows that!  Once to forbid eating, once to forbid cooking, and once to forbid getting benefit.  However, Chazal actually have another drash on the three times; this time as exclusions.  That is, the Torah is telling us that the issur cooking/eating/benefiting from mixtures of milk and meat does not apply to:
  1. non-domesticated animals; deer and the like
  2. tamei (ie, non-kosher species) of animals; pigs and the like
  3. birds; chickens and the like
Not that bothered me for a long time for two reasons.  First, how do you get six drashos from three occurrences?  Second, how did birds get on that list?  That list should be animals to which I would have thought the issur applies.  I would have thought animals that give milk, but that doesn't include birds.  If, on they other hand, I would have thought any non-plant living thing, then fish should be on the list also.

After searching and searching, I found an answer to my first question in the Sifsei Chachamim.  ("Searching and searching"... Allen, the Sifsei Chachamim is printed right there next to Rashi!  Sheesh... talk about lazy!)  [Please ignore that parenthetical remark; it's just my alter ego trying to keep my honest.]  Anyway, and I think with a little squinting it helps with my second question also.

The Sifsei Chachamim says that the drash regarding which species of animals to exclude is going on the Torah's use of the word "g'di" (kid) in each instance.  The Torah could have just said "don't cook an animal in milk"; using the word g'di is to add the additional drash.

How does that help with my second question?  Rashi explains the word g'di to mean any soft cuddly offspring ("valad rach").  It's a bit of a chidush, but I would like to propose that besides calves and lambs (which Rashi specifically mentions as examples), baby chicks are also soft and cuddly.  Fish (as proven by my granddaughter) are not cute and cuddly at all.  What about the whole milk issue?  I have an idea about that, but it needs more research.  Not like my cute and cuddly baby chicks theory, for which I have ample evidence.

In case you are worried that Avigayil is soon going to notice that "swimming upside down" is a lot like "dead"; apparently she herself has already thought of that.  Avigayil has acquired for herself  a pet rock.  Not the brilliantly marketed pet rocks of several year ago, this was a stray that she picked up and named "peto" (pronounced "pet'-oh").  The kid is nothing if not practical and resilient.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more