Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Freedom Comes Only With Involvement In Talmud Torah

I am officially old; I have proof.  Last night on the bus ride home, a 20-something young man offered his seat to me.  No, that's not a proof; after all, some people will do things like that just to elicit a reaction.  (Not that I know anyone like that, of course.)  No, my proof is that I gratefully accepted his offer.  Apparently respect for elders is not dead.  At least for us non-dead elders.

The theme of the seder night is cheirus -- freedom from bondage.  One of the ways we experience that feeling is by reclining while we eat the ceremonial unleavened bread and drink the ceremonial four cups of wine.  In fact, if one eats or drinks without reclining, the eating/drinking needs to be repeated. (I know, I know... lots of caveats, but that's the basic halacha.)  There is one exception: a talmid who is at the seder with his rebbi does not recline without specific permission from his rebbi.  In fact, says the Halichos Shlomo, it is not even permitted for the talmid to ask permission to recline.  The asking in and of itself is a breach of the respect due his rebbi.  The Halichos Shlomo notes that as important as reclining is to the seder, no one ever suggests that the talmid would be better off eating his seder elsewhere.  It seems that sitting at the seder table with one's rebbi is more important than the demonstration of cheirus by reclining.  Why?

R' Shlomo Zalman is reported to have given two (complimentary, it seems to me) explanations.  First, the feeling of yirah (awe/fear/respect) one feels in the presence of his rebbi in general is more important than the specific need to recline at the seder table.  I understand him to mean that just being in the presence of his rebbi has enough effect on his n'shama that he is not losing any shleimus in his avodas HaShem by not reclining.  (Got enough negatives and double negatives there, pardner?)  Alternatively, said R' Auerbach, the amount of growth that comes from watching how his rebbi performs the mitzvos of the night, his conduct with other people at the table, and even the tenor of his ordinary conversation is such a growth experience that it overrides the need for reclining.

I would like to suggest that these explanations are really a powerful implementation of the statement of our Chazal: Ein l'cha ben chorin ele mi sh'osek b'talmud torah -- there is no free person except one who is involved with learning/doing Torah. (Avos 6:2).  The seder is for everyone.. children, adults, the simple son, the wise son, the son at risk, and the one who doesn't even know what to ask.  For someone who has a rebbi and feels the yira of his presence, there is no greater expression of freedom from all bondage than sitting up straight in his presence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...