Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Is "Not Forbidden" Equivalent to "Permitted"?

Of course a Jew may not eat meat from a treifa.  That is, from an animal that has certain simanim that basically means the animal would have died if it hadn't been killed.  That is different than n'veila, which is meat from an animal that was killed by some other means than sh'chita.  For example, a deer killed by a rifle bullet or the bumper of a 4x4 filled with drunk would-be hunters.  (I suspect a lot of those "hunters" actually just got lucky and caught a deer in their headlights.)  Then there is meat from a b'heima t'mei'a -- pork, for example.  Who cares why it's forbidden?  Forbidden is forbidden, right?  Well, l'ma'aseh, maybe; though it often comes up in case of situations where the details of what actually happened are not clear.  But philosophically, there is a lot to learn from the details.

For example, the Torah only prescribes a punishment (lashes, in this case) if one ate a "shiur" (in this case a k'zayis) of the issur.  What about eating less than the torah prescribed shiur?  That is the subject of a machlokes Reish Lakish and R' Yochanon; Reish Lakish says chatzi shiur mutar m'd'oraisa (but, of course, assur m'd'rabanan), while R' Yochanan says chatzi shiur assur m'd'oraisa. We pasken like R' Yochanan, but I saw a fascinating question regarding this machlokes this morning.  Since we are all going crazy about shiurim now ("Abba!  Are you sure that I need to eat that much matzah?!?  Any how fast?!?"), I figured that siting was propitious timing.

According to Reish Lakish, would a person be allowed (on a d'oraiso level) to shecht an animal on yom tov that he knows is a treifa with the intent to eat only pakos pakos min ha'shiur; say less than an ounce every 11 minutes or so (just to be safe)?  It's such a cool question because one is allowed, of course, to shecht an animal on yom tov l'tzorech ochel nefesh -- the the sake of eating -- because freshly shechted meat is much yummier than the stuff that's been sitting on the shelves for a few days/weeks/...

This question was discussed by R' Kahaneman (Ponevezh Rosh Yeshiva) in his youth when he was sitting at the yom tov table with the Aruch haShulchan (its author, actually, R' Yechiel Michel Epstein).  The Aruch haShulchan said he would be amazed if the Torah would allow such a thing.  The heter of tzorech ochel nefesh, he reasoned, is based on enhancing one's yom tov experience; how could such a thing be possible?  Besides, who says the Torah even allows one to shecht any animal with the intent of eating less than a shiur?  Maybe the Torah only allowed sh'chita l'tzorech ochel nefesh for something that has a din "achila"; ie, a k'zayis or more.  R' Kahaneman wasn't so sure one needed to be some amazed if it would be that the Torah allowed that.  After all, the Torah does not forbid it and it could increase one's simchas yom tov; so maybe.

For my part, I was amazed (still) at the huge gap between the conversation at my yom tov table and the yom tov table of g'dolim from the not too distant past.  You'd think I would be past being amazed.  Isn't it amazing that I'm not?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more