Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When It Is Permitted to Nullify a Forbidden Substance

I once had a boss who loved to poke fun at any religion.  He stopped trying with me after a few attempts, though, for a couple of reasons.  The first was because every time he tried to point out a logical inconsistency with my belief system, I was always able to show him the issue was his lack of knowledge and not my beliefs.  The turning point was when he thought we could not even a molecule of pork; he was very disappointed when I explained the concept of bitul to him.  The second was that he was an avid bird watcher and would sometimes show me pictures of some of the more exotic birds he had seen.  One had two, single, long feather straight back from its tail.  "Isn't that amazing?", he exclaimed.  "Yes!", I rejoined, "What's the evolutionary advantage it gets from extra weight and drag on his body that will make flight more difficult and therefore make him an easier target for predators?"  He didn't like me very much.

Usually, bitul is a b'di'avad affair.  We have a rule (Shulchan Aruch Y.D. 99:5) of "ein m'vatlin issur l'chatchila"/one is not permitted to nullify a forbidden substance.  That is, one is not permitted to add issur even though it's taste will not be noticeable (even to an expert).  For example, some preservatives and settling agents are not kosher; a company seeking kosher certification would need to find kosher alternatives.  Moreover, one is likewise not allowed to add heter to a mixture into which issur fell in order to nullify it.  For example, if one ounce of milk fell into 30 ounces of beef stew, one would not be allowed to add another 30 ounces of stew to nullify it.  (I chose beef stew and not chicken soup because the M'chaber permits one to nullify an issur d'rabanan.  It's and interesting question if an Ashkenazi Jew is permitted to ask his S'fardi friend to fix up his chicken soup.)

There is, however, one case where one is, in fact, permitted to nullify issur: when the process that nullifies the issur is not being done to nullify it.  Huh?  The classic example is honey.  Raw honey i always teeming with bee parts.  Not whole bees, just parts; apparently the honey collection process is brutal enough to dismember any bee that tries to go down with her hive.  Apparently, honey is not uniformly sweet, so honey needs to be cooked.  That is, the cooking is done as part of the normal processing of the honey.  A side benefit of cooking the honey is that the bee parts dissolve and one is left with much less that one part in 60 -- Ta Da!  bees are nullified and honey is kosher.

This can come up at home, also.  Frozen raspberries have bugs (not might have bugs, they have bugs).  If you grind up the raspberries in a blender, you would smash those bugs to smithereens; again nullifying them.  You are not allowed to blend the raspberries just to smash up the bugs; so this won't get you raspberry soup.  However, a fruit smoothy is made by blending the fruit (and, presumably, other ingredients) to a delectable much; hence the term "smoothy".  In that case, you can even make your smoothy with raspberries.

You don't want to question having smashed up bug bits in your food... trust me, just look away.  Unless you are really interested, then look here, in the FDA's Defect Levels Handbook.  There you can find legal levels of all sorts of unappetizing things in your food.  I told you not to look.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...