Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Twenty Three Dimensions to Each and Every Sin

I was struck by the following idea at n'ila a few years ago. Ashamnu, bagadnu, ... gazalnu? From global to specific? Rather, I think we can understand all 23 expressions of admission as applying to each and every sin that we commit. Even if this is not p'shat, it gives a perspective on the damage done by every sin, even the "little" ones.  This bears reconsideration as we enter the season of the three weeks leading to Tisha b'Av and then on to the Yamim Nora'im.

Ashamnu:
We start with a simple declaration; we are guilty.
Bagadnu:
We woke up in the morning and declared, "... raba emunasecha" -- great is your faith (in us); and we have betrayed that trust.
Gazalnu:
The whole world and everything in it belongs to HaShem. He and only He has a right to grant its use. By using the world for anything that is against His Will, we have stolen.
Dibarnu Dofi:
We say one thing and do another. More than that, however, we swore at Har Sinai to accept the Torah and dedicate our lives to fulfilling it. Each and every action, thought, or even feeling to the contrary is a declaration that we saying one thing but harboring contrary thoughts and attitudes inside. Nothing could be more duplicitous than that.
He'evinu v'hirshanu:
Our actions have an impact on the entire world. When we sin, the entire system is distorted, which allows (and even encourages) more sin.
Zadnu:
If one carries a loaded weapon into a crowded theater, how "accidental" can any damage we cause be claimed? When our guilt is so apparent, HaShem's righteousness so obvious; can we really claim that are sin was anything less than intentional??
Chamasnu:
To destroy something so beautiful and precious as this world cannot be called anything less than recklessly violent.
Tafalnu Sheker:
The signature/seal of HaShem is Emes (Truth). Acting against Ratzon HaShem means to attach ourselves to something "not" HaShem.... and is, perforce, a lie.
Ya'atznu Ra:
Our body has desires and it comes to us insistently, like a child. Our job is to direct it to performance of miztvos, to channel its amazing energy toward holiness, not away. Can there be any more evil advice than giving ourselves council to sin?
Kizavnu:
We have abandoned our post, and failed to perform our mission of perfection ourselves and the entire creation.
Latznu:
We could not possibly have done any of this if we had kept in mind the importance of every action; rather we have taken our actions lightly to the point of making fun of them.
Maradnu:
Is it possible to be more rebellious than to use the very gifts that HaShem gives to us to violate His Will?
Ni'atznu:
None of our actions are "behind His back", so to speak. We flagrantly violate His Will "in His Face" (so to speak).
Sararnu:
"Halacha" means, the way; and we have turned away from it.
Avinu, Pashanu:
Every sin has aspects of both "simple" and willful sin.
Tzararnu:
The destructiveness of our sins damages and distresses everyone.
Kishinu Oref:
An immature child wants to assert his identity by being stubborn. We, on the other hand, are very familiar with the maturity of subjugating oneself to a higher authority. All of us have been touched by the need to follow a doctor's advice, for example. Being stubborn with regard to HaShem borders on k'fira.
Shichasnu:
There is no way that one can disturb such and intricate and balanced system without causing some destruction.
Ti'avnu:
We have made ourselves disgusting with our behaviour.
Ta'inu:
We looked away and told ourselves we were simply "straying".
Ti'tanu:
We have blamed HaShem for letting us go away and we have given up hope that He even wants us back. Giving up hope, says the Michtav Me'Eliyahu, testifies that we didn't want it in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק