Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Twenty Three Dimensions to Each and Every Sin

I was struck by the following idea at N'ila a few years ago. We are guilty, we betrayed, ... we stole? From global to specific? Rather, I think we can understand all 23 expressions of admission as applying to each and every sin that we commit. Even if this is not p'shat, it gives a perspective on the damage done by every sin, even the "little" ones. This bears reconsideration as we enter the season of the three weeks leading to Tisha b'Av and then on to the Yamim Nora'im.

Ashamnu:
We start with a simple declaration; we are guilty.
Bagadnu:
We woke up in the morning and declared, "... raba emunasecha"—great is your faith (in us); and we have betrayed that trust.
Gazalnu:
The whole world and everything in it belongs to HaShem. He and only He has a right to grant its use. By using the world for anything that is against His Will, we have stolen.
Dibarnu Dofi:
We say one thing and do another. More than that, however, we swore at Har Sinai to accept the Torah and dedicate our lives to fulfilling it. Each and every action, thought, or even feeling to the contrary is a declaration that we saying one thing but harboring contrary thoughts and attitudes inside. Nothing could be more duplicitous than that.
He'evinu v'hirshanu:
Our actions have an impact on the entire world. When we sin, the entire system is distorted, which allows (and even encourages) more sin.
Zadnu:
If one carries a loaded weapon into a crowded theater, how "accidental" can any damage we cause be claimed? When our guilt is so apparent and HaShem's righteousness so obvious, can we really claim that our sin was anything less than intentional??
Chamasnu:
To destroy something so beautiful and precious as this world cannot be called anything less than recklessly violent.
Tafalnu Sheker:
The signature/seal of HaShem is Emes (Truth). Acting against Ratzon HaShem means to attach ourselves to something "not" HaShem... and is, perforce, a lie.
Ya'atznu Ra:
Our body has desires, and it comes to us insistently, like a child. Our job is to direct it to performance of miztvos, to channel its amazing energy toward holiness, not away. Can there be any more evil advice than giving ourselves counsel to sin?
Kizavnu:
We have abandoned our post and failed to perform our mission of perfection ourselves and the entire creation.
Latznu:
We could not possibly have done any of this if we had kept in mind the importance of every action; rather we have taken our actions lightly to the point of making fun of them.
Maradnu:
Is it possible to be more rebellious than to use the very gifts that HaShem gives to us to violate His Will?
Ni'atznu:
None of our actions are "behind His back," so to speak. We flagrantly violate His Will "in His Face" (so to speak).
Sararnu:
"Halacha" means "the way," and we have turned away from it.
Avinu, Pashanu:
Every sin has aspects of both "simple" and willful sin.
Tzararnu:
The destructiveness of our sins damages and distresses everyone.
Kishinu Oref:
An immature child wants to assert his identity by being stubborn. We, on the other hand, are very familiar with the maturity of subjugating oneself to a higher authority. All of us have been touched by the need to follow a doctor's advice, for example. Being stubborn with regard to HaShem borders on k'fira.
Shichasnu:
There is no way that one can disturb such an intricate and balanced system without causing some destruction.
Ti'avnu:
We have made ourselves disgusting with our behavior.
Ta'inu:
We looked away and told ourselves we were simply "straying."
Ti'tanu:
We have blamed HaShem for letting us go away, and we have given up hope that He even wants us back. Giving up hope, says the Michtav Me'Eliyahu, testifies that we didn't want it in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...