Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Wonder of Creating Spirituality from Physicality

Have you every wondered how soap works?  I mean, you have grease on your hands and the water just beads up.  You add soap and -- presto! -- the grease rinses right off.   (If you never wondered about that, I can only wonder about your sense of wonder.)   Since I began my college career as a chemistry major, I can enlighten you and save you any more needless sleepless nights (worrying over this topic, at least).  The problem is that grease and water don't mix.  The soap is a long-ish and schizophrenic molecule; one end dissolves in grease, the other in water.  So the soap is essentially an annoying shadchan, it gets the water and grease together (two things that do not belong together), and then stays there in the middle keeping them glued together. ("No, really, it's mamash a perfect shidduch min ha'sha'mayim!")

(I left chemistry over soap, actually.  I got my soap answer marked wrong on an exam just because it wasn't possible to actually synthesize the chemical I proposed as the answer.  The professor agreed it would work, just that it couldn't actually be made.  I said, "The question didn't ask for a real chemical, just one that would work."  He said, "I'm leaving it marked as incorrect, Michael.  If you are only interested in how things actually work, you should be in the physics department."  The rest, as they say, is history.)

The Rema in Shulchan Aruch OC 6:1 says that the meaning of "mafli la'asos" at the end of "asher yatzar" is that HaShem ties a spiritual entity to a physical entity.  I always had in mind something like the soap; the spiritual and physical tethered together.  I didn't get why that was so astounding, but there are lots of things I don't get.

Last week was parshas Naso; I am particularly partial to the haftarah of Naso because it was the haftarah I did for my faux-bar mitzvah.  I noticed something new this year... when Manoach and his wife offer a korban to HaShem, the angel creates the fire, ascends heavenward in the flame, and then simply vanishes; and only then to they realize that he was an angel and not a prophet. (Shoftim 13:22)  What struck me in particular that the navi refers to the creation of the fire on the stone alter is  "mafli la'asos"; just as in the bracha.  The M'tzudas Dovid explains that the wondrous act was to bring fire out of stone.

The ancients described the world as being formed from four elements: earth, air, fire, and water.  In fact, though, it's really three and one; fire, air, and water all move, whereas earth is completely inert.  Anything physical entity that moves has some combination of fire, air, and/or water that is moving earth.  Earth itself, however, is nothing on its own except a vehicle for the other elements to accomplish their function.  For the angel to bring the most ethereal of the elements from the completely inert stone was truly and act of wonder.

Perhaps that is what the Rema means.  The mafli la'asos of being human is to be able to produce spirituality from completely physical actions.  It is particularly wondrous when one contemplates that fact after having just done the most animalistic of our daily activities.

Maybe I should read the haftara more often... Now that would be my own mafli la'asos!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק