Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Undoing the Effect of Stealing

You may already know this, but just to be clear: HaShem runs the world.  Obvious, right?  Well... the Chovos HaLevavos carries this to its logical conclusion and notes the following two facts.  If you are supposed to have something -- even something of great value -- then no one can prevent you from having it, nor can they take it away from you.  If, on the other hand, you are not suppose to have something -- even something of absolutely trivial value -- then there is no way you can keep it in your possession.

How then, you are wondering, is it possible to have steal anything?  In fact, how can stealing be an aveira?  Wait... how can there even be free will?!  Hang on, hang on... that, of course, is a ridiculously complex subject, but let's stick to our original question and a surface answer.  Stealing means taking someone else's stuff without their permission.  It doesn't matter that the thief couldn't have taken it and the victim couldn't have lost it unless HaShem wanted that to happen.  That's HaShem's issue.  The thief's issue is that he has stolen property in his possession and the Torah has prescribed a course for him to follow.  Theft is a lav sh'nitek l'asei; there is, however, a machlokes about precisely what is entailed in that asei.

The discussion storms around an interesting halachik anomaly known as "gezel ha'ger".  The Torah says that stolen property needs to be returned (that's our asei), but if the victim has died and has no relatives, then the property needs to be returned to HaShem via His agents, the kohanim.  How, wonders the gemara, is it possible that a Jew has no relatives?  After all, trace back far enough and all Jews come from Yaakov Avinu, right?  Oh, wait... right... it must be a ger who has no children; nebbuch.  So Shmendrick stole from our childless ger, whom we'll call Geiry.  Shmendrick hears that Geiry has died and feels badly about having stolen his cholent, so he heads up to Yerushalyim to return the value of the cholent ($15.37, with tax) to the kohanim.  On the way, he meets none other than... Geiry!  Shmendrick runs over to Geiry, who says, "Listen, I see you want to return the value of the cholent you stole.  I'll retroactively turn that into a $15.37 loan.  You just repay me, and we'll be even."  (Geirim are like that... they'll give you the shirt off their back.)   As Shmendrick is (with a tear of joy in his eye) reaching for his wallet, Geiry has a heart attack and dies.  "Great," thinks Shmendrick, "Now what do I do?!"

R' Yossi HaG'lili says that Shmedrick can keep the money.  Good ole Geiry corrected the theft by turning it (even retroactively) into a loan.  Now that Geiry is dead, all his property is hefkeir, Shmendrick has the money in his pocket, so he acquires it.  R' Akiva, though, says, "No way!  You haven't fixed up the sin until that money leaves your pocket!" (Bava Kama 109a)

So you are left with a machlokes tana'im.  My advice: don't steal from geirim; after all, all of my best friends have a friend who is a ger.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...