Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Stringencies of Purim Over Chanuka

To me, one of the starkest demonstrations that we (ie, Jews) take our religion (ie, Orthodox Judaism) seriously is that we celebrate holidays because HaShem told us to.  We didn't just pick events, like... say... oh I don't know... Moshe Rabeinu's birth and decided to dedicate a winter holiday to its commemoration.  We eat matzah in the spring, count to 50 and eat cheesecake, then blow a horn, fast, and build huts in the autumn; all and only because HaShem told us to.  Members of the Christian and Reform Jewish religions, on the other hand, eat colored eggs and oranges, respectively, in the spring; because they decided that would be cool.  'Nuff said.

There are, of course, two holidays that do not have an explicit source in the Chumash -- those would be, or course, Purim and Chanuka.  I used the term "explicit source", because both actually needed to find support in the Chumash before they could even be considered.  Moreover, we make the standard bracha of "asher kidishanu b'mitzvosav v'tzivanu" -- He sanctified us with His commandments and [He] commanded us to [fill in appropriately].  Hence, are actions are still those demanded by the Creator, albeit revealed through the halachik process rather than at Has Sinai.

Of these two, though, we see that Purim is a bit more stringent than Chanuka, and that can lead a very real practical difference.  In general, a koton can not be motzi a gadol in a mitzvah d'oraisa, but he may motzi a gadol in a mitzvah d'rabanan.  It is common when a boy becomes 13 for his family to want to get the nachas of having him make kiddush, or leining to be motzi the olam.  The problem is, that turning 13 is not quite enough, he also has to sprout two hairs (Shulchan Aruch OC 54:9).  Most boys that age are absolutely not interested in having someone check that out, so we rely on chazaka; they usually have sprouted those hairs by 13.  That's fine for d'rabanans, but not for d'oraisos.  Kiddush (as along as everyone already davened ma'ariv), leining (except parshas Zachor and maybe parshas Parah) are both rabbinic obligations, so we are good to go.

Chanuka is also, of course, d'rabanan, and the Mishna Brura says that a koton can (in a sha'as d'chak) motzi a gadol in candle lighting.  He does not, however, give that recommendation for leining m'gila.  Some want to say he is relying on what he wrote about Chanuka a few simanin earlier, but the consensus seems to be that Purim is more stringent for three reasons.

First, Purim is m'divrei kabala; sanctioned by the prophets -- sort of a middle ground between d'oraisa and d'rabanan.  Second, the mitzvah at Purim for a koton is only to hear m'gila, not read it (similar to the obligation for a woman; and, in fact, it's easier to permit a koton to read for a woman than for a man).  Third, leining is public and there is kavod ha'tzibur to consider; a special reading being performed by a koton in problematic.

In any case, did you notice that a koton has an obligation to hear the m'gila?  Just wanted to be sure... so you'll allow them to klahp Haman (if that's your minhag), but you'll also keep things under control (since that's your obligation as a parent).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...