Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Why It Is Forbidden to Eat Before Making a Bracha

I take full responsibility for the rough night you had last night worrying about the Maharsha's concern that sefeik brachos l'hakeil shouldn't apply to birkos ha'ne'henin because eating without making a bracha is considered stealing.  That would mean that a safeik bracha is also safeik stealing, and stealing is d'oraiso, so that rule of safeik d'oraisa would mean that you should make a (possibly second) bracha.  I forgot to add that we don't pasken like this Maharsha, so you can stand down.  Or maybe you should be nervous... let's see.

Why is eating without first making a bracha considered stealing?  It's a drash from Chazal contrasting two p'sukim from T'hilim.  First, "LaShem ha'aretz u'm'lo'ah"/The world and everything in it belongs to HaShem (T'hilim 24:1).  Second, "ha'shamyim shamyim LaShem, v'ha'aretz nosson livnei adam"/The heavens belong to HaShem, and the earth He has given to people (T'hilim 115:16).  R' Leivi (TB Brachos 35a) noted the contradiction and concluded that the first is before making the bracha, the second is after making the bracha.

Stealing is serious business.  Stealing from HaShem is very serious business.  A close chaver of mine wanted to suggest "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav ha'rai'ya", putting the burden of proof on HaShem that I didn't make the bracha.  Somehow, though, I don't think I want that to be my defense in the beis din shel ma'alah.  I can just hear the prosecuting angel saying, "Sure; no problem. Run the tape, please, bailiff."

Minchas Shlomo (Vol 1, 18:9) notes that this Maharsha has a hard row to hoe.  An onein, who is not allowed to make brachos, certainly is allowed to eat.  If he eats bread, though, he'll need to wash first (without a bracha, of course) because it is built on an issur of t'ruma.  So if there were any issur at all, the onein would not be able to eat.

The Minchas Shlomo answers that the issur to eat before the bracha is because of the strength of the obligation to make the bracha and not that there is a separate issur that the bracha is removing.  This is similar to the situation before kiddush or havdalah when was is also not allowed to eat.  The kiddush and havdalah ceremonies do not remove an issur, rather the issur exists because of the obligation to perform the ceremony.  What about the stealing?  That is part of the decree to enforce how and why it is so important to make a bracha before eating.  Benefiting from the incomparable generosity of HaShem without even saying thank you is tantamount to being a brazen thief and snatching what you want from the King as if He didn't know and couldn't stop you.

Somehow I don't think I want that as my defense in the beis din shel ma'alah either: Hey!  It wasn't really stealing all those time I ate without making a proper bracha, just tantamount to stealing!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more