Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Temporary and Almost Temporary Knots

Sewing and tying are two ways to create a permanent connection.   Buttons and buckles are often used to create temporary connections; that is connections that by there very nature are meant to be  broken.  Buttons and buckles, in fact, are only used to create temporary connections, so it is always permitted to button/unbutton and buckle/unbuckle on Shabbos.  That's true even if the intent is to leave the connection till after Shabbos (putting on my shoes for mincha), or the garment came into Shabbos connected (my suit jacket Friday night).  Sewing is almost always meant to be permanent, and so is essentially forbidden on Shabbos.  (There are some possible exceptions.)

Knots are funny because they can be used both for temporary and permanent connections.  Knots that are meant to be undone soon (preferably within the day, but up to a week in case of need) are permitted l'chatchila.  Tying shoes, putting on a gartel, cinching my robe closed; all no problem.  Knots that are meant to be permanent because they are creating something, such as to form a loop in a camel's nose to which I can attach his leash, are forbidden m'd'oraisa.  Knots that are meant to last a long time to perform a useful function, attaching a rope to a bucket so I can draw water from a well for example, are generally prohibited by Rabbinic decree; but, of course, there is wiggle room there.

Then there are knots that perform some useful function -- and I definitely want them to remain until that task is completed -- but then I couldn't care less what happens.  One example of that is new paired garments (shoes and mittens, for example) that are tied together to prevent them from becoming separated until they are sold.  The manufacturer certainly wants that knot to remain in place until sold.  After that, however, he couldn't care less what happens.  The pokim allow cutting those knots off.  (Cutting is generally preferred to untying because it's less work and destructive; both factors increasing the permissibility.)  R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach says the heter is because any knot meant to be undone cannot be categorized as permanent.  R' Nissim Karelitz says the reason is because the knot is intended to prevent the items from being functional, so (again) it is by nature temporary.

Another kind of knot that I don't care about after some time is tying a plastic garbage bag closed before disposal or taping closed a dirtied disposable diaper.  In both cases I really, really want the knot/tape to stay solid until it gets to the dump, but don't give it a second thought once it is gone.  This is worse than the glove/shoe case, because these knots are never likely to actually be undone.  There is also the fact that taping a diaper closed is more like sewing.  There is also the fact (mentioned above) that some sewing is also by nature temporary and so there my be some leniency in undoing it.

Out of time/space, though; we won't be able to sew up all the knotty issues today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...