Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Striving to Be Whole

G-d was talking with Eve one day in the Garden of Eden.  "I'm lonely.", she said.  "Well... I have an idea for a companion for you; a man."  "What's a man?", Eve asked.  "Well... he's a little bigger and stronger than you, so perfect for hunting up food and building you a place to live.  He's not so bright, so he he won't give you any real problems.  Mostly he's just a big baby, but he will take care of your creature comforts."  "That's sounds great!  Thank you!"  "Oh," said G-d, "one more little thing.  To get him to work he needs a pretty big ego.  We will need to let him think he was created first."

What's wrong with that picture?  Besides the obvious, I mean.  The real problem is that it completely misses an essential detail in the creation of the human being.  To whit, neither man nor woman came first.  Chava didn't come from Adam; both Adam and Chava came from the first (and only, in fact) human being.  Hold on, now, we need to take a bit of a deep dive.  You need to know that Adam and Chava originally were in such as refined state  that we would not have been able to see them.  Their concept of physicality (ie, the lowest level of spirituality) was something like our concept of spirituality.  Eating from the tree plunged them into a foreign and hostile environment that required a protective suit; namely, a physical body.  Something like the pressure suit that an astronaut must wearin space or on the moon.  Not pretty, very bulky and clumsy, but allows him to live and function in that environment.

So Adam and Chava were created as one being, then separated, then given the task of putting themselves back together.  All the King's cherubim and all the King's s'raphim couldn't put Adam back together again; only Adam and Chava on their own can re-unite to become one again.  Even after their mistake; just now they have to work together wearing pressure suits.  That is a huge task; and scary.  It means depending on one another so completely that her success is his success, and vice versa.  Of course, it also means that her failure is his failure.  They become one together or die apart.  The stakes are very high; literally all or nothing.

So who is this Lilith creature?  Lilith is separate.  She tells Adam that she is equal to him in all dimensions.  She wants to compete with Adam.  What's his attraction to her?  Men love competition.  Having a good competitor means sometimes winning and sometimes losing.  So Lilith offers basically lots of fun, plenty of excitement, and no commitment; a dream come true.  Well, a dream anyway, because she doesn't offer anything real.  Finite fun, infinite suffering.  Not a great option, actually.

Baruch HaShem, Adam chose reality.  Lots of work; not a dream at all.  Rather, reality and the opportunity to forever experience the greatest and most perfect good -- a relationship with the Creator of reality Himself.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...