Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: G'milus Chasadim is D'Oraisa

I suppose this should be obvious.  After all, I say every morning that g'milus chasadim is among those things that on the one hand no matter how much you do the Torah would like you to try for more; while on the other hand no kindness is considered insignificant.  Moreover, I also daily declare each morning that the principle reward for g'milus chasadim remains intact for us when we arrive to olam haba, while we benefit from interest earned while still in this world.  With all that, I was still struck by two points that Mishna Brura makes about the importance of g'milus chasadim.

Siman 72 of the Shulchan Aruch, O. Ch. discusses the obligation to say k'ri'as sh'ma and daven when someone is involved in a funeral procession; be it carrying the coffin, comforting the mourners, or simply accompanying the deceased.  The p'sak of the Shulchan Aruch is that those who are accompanying the deceased are obligated in k'ri'as sh'ma and exempt from t'fila.  The Mishna Brura explains (s.k. 3) that even though escorting the deceased is included in g'milus chasadim and g'milus chasadim is from the a Torah,  none the less, they can certainly stop to say at least the first verse with appropriate concentration.  (As always, the expression "first verse" of sh'ma means both "sh'ma yisrael..." and "baruch sheim k'vod...".)  That means that except for the fact that saying sh'ma does not interfere with the g'milus chasadim of escorting the deceased, one would not be obligated (nor even allowed) to say k'ri'as sh'ma.  Moreover, the escorters are still exempt from t'filla because that would interfere.

Now, those who are actually carrying the coffin (whether actually carrying or waiting to spell those who are carrying) are exempt from k'ri'as sh'ma (and certainly from t'fila).  Here the Mishna Brura (s.k. 2) points out that if there is a group that takes care of Jewish funeral arrangements, so the carriers are all volunteers, then everyone in that group who is helping with the carrying is exempt.  Since they want the z'chus of carrying the deceased, they are exempt.  In other words, we don't say that there is a mitzvah of k'ri'as sh'ma and so the group has to choose the minimum to be involved because it would interfere with the important mitzvah d'oraisa of k'ri'as sh'ma.  Instead, HaShem says, "You want to do a chesed?  Let Me clear the path for you."  There is one condition on that last bit.  The Mishna Brura (siman 38, s.k. 24) has already noted that to be considered oseik b'mitzvah, one's intention should not be primarily to reap a profit.  I don't know anyone who went into the chevra kadisha to become rich, so we are probably safe on that one.

I found this topic very comforting, because I am very concerned about causing bitul z'man.  Now I know that since anyone who reads these TftD's is being a gomel chesed to me and no one is getting paid to read them, so they are actually oseik b'mitzvah. Whew!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...