Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: More vs Deeper/Sharper/Beautifuler

First, a lesson in modern physics. There are many measurables that we use to characterize a physical object and its motion through space-time. Among these are mass, position, velocity, energy, charge, etc... etc... etc. Among these are groupings known as canonically conjugate variables: location/momentum (mass times velocity), time interval/energy transition, and more. The cool thing that was discovered with the age of modern physics in early 1900s was that the more precisely you measure one member of the pair, the more uncertainty you create in measuring the other member. Suppose, for example, you measure very precisely the position of a proton at one moment. You won't be able to predict where it is the next moment because you created an inherent uncertainty in its momentum (and therefore velocity). The universe just puts hard limits on what it will allow us to know about it.

"They" (you know who they are... the same ones who call it dope) say something like that about all sorts of things; among them: truth vs beauty, time vs money, quality vs quantity. You get, so they say, one at the expense of the other. I beg to differ. (Shocking; I know.)  Let's take "time vs money", for example. While still in graduate school, my research adviser revealed to me an important truth -- as valuable anything else I learned from him: the fastest way to do anything is slowly and carefully. Tried and True.

What about quality vs quantity? We've seen two examples where the highest quality comes, in fact, specifically with greater quantity: Shabbos/Chanuka candles, halacha following Beis Hillel. However, I know of two examples that seems to contradict that. First, the Mishna Brura says that fewer סליחות/penitential prayers with כוונה/intent is better than more סליחות without כוונה. Is that a contraindication to our conjecture? I think not. סליחות does not mean sounding out Hebrew letters. סליחות without כוונה are not low quality/high volume penitential prayers; it's just low quality noise. As further proof, the Mishna Brura goes on to say that, of course, more סליחות with כוונה is even better.

But there is another case: hilchos brachos. After specificity (more specific comes first), the next consideration is שלימות/wholeness/perfection, and only then comes size. If you were planning to eat one whole pea and one huge slice of watermelon, then you would make the bracha on the pea, because it is שָׁלֵם/whole; whereas the huge slice of watermelon is not שָׁלֵם. Is that a deviation? I don't think so; I think it a more precise fit to the bracha. The bracha for "the fruit of the ground", not "for pieces of fruit that come from the ground." In fact, if you have an almond and an apple, the bracha should be made on the apple -- because it is bigger, and even though you like almonds better.

What about truth vs beauty? This is an ancient canard. Shlomo HaMelech tells us that a beautiful women without sense is a gold ring in a sow's nose (Mishlei 11:20); and that grace is beauty is a deceitful vapor (Mishlei 31:30). Beauty is never anything but an adornment. Truth needs no adornment; it is beautiful. Beauty on anything else is a horrible lie.

So it is not time vs money, but most value comes from spending most time; not quality vs quantity, but quality because of quantity; not truth vs beauty, but beautiful because it is true. More is, ultimately, Deeper/Sharper/Beautifuler.

Two caveats: (1) There is a Torah way to spend your time, increase quantity, and search for Truth; Torah underlies everything. (2) Sorry... it really is location vs. momentum and time interval vs. energy transition; reality is, after all, reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc