Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Magnifying vs Beautifying a Mitzvah

Shabbos candles and Chanuka candles are both נר מצוה/mitzvah candles. Being a נר מצוה, one is not allowed to use it to light an ordinary candle; nor even a match with the intent to light another נר מצוה. What about lighting one נר מצוה directly from another? Of course there are opinions all over the place. However, when the halachic dust has settled we are left with the following: You are allowed to light one Shabbos candle from another, but one may not light one Chanuka candle from another.

The correct response to that p'sak halacha is: Huh!? I know that is the correct response, as the Biur Halacha (263:1, d.h. שתי פתילות) asks the question in a surprised tone of writing. (Albeit more eloquently than simply, "huh!?")

Of course on Chanuka, we have a halachic basis for how many candles we light each night: The number of candles one lights corresponds to the number of days we are into the Chanuka celebration; one candle on the first night, two on the second, three on the third, and so on until the culmination of the holiday when we have a beautifully full menorah with eight dazzling lights. Regarding Shabbos, on the other hand, we have only custom to guide us. Some light two (corresponding to שמור/guard and זכור/remember; each appearing in the עשרת הדברות), some light seven (corresponding to the days of the week), some light 10 (corresponding to the עשרת הדברות), and others light one new candle for each new child. The Biur Halacha tells us that are first reaction, therefore, ought to be to expect the halacha to be more lenient regarding one Chanuka candle from another -- both of which have a halachic basis -- than lighting one Shabbos candle from another -- where the extra lights are מנהג בעלמא/simply customary practice.

 We need to dig a bit deeper.  What is the function of all those candles? When it comes to Chanukah, the first is for the mitzvah, all subsequent candles are a beautification (הִדוּר) of the mitzvah. When it comes to Shabbos, though, the main mitzvah nowadays is כבוד שבת/respect/glorification of Shabbos.  (It is also because of having enough light to (1) not stub your toes and bump into things, (2) be able to see your food and thus enjoy it more. Both of those are pretty much covered by our electric lights.) Adding more candles, therefore (notes the Biur Halacha) is actually increasing the כבוד שבת, not simply beautifying it. That is, even though our additional Shabbos lights are a מנהג בעלמא, that increase is magnifying the mitzvah itself.

The conclusion of the Biur Halacha is that each Shabbos candle is an equal participant in the mitzvah; therefore may one light one Shabbos candle from another. Besides the first Chanuka candle, though, the remainder are only beautifying the mitzvah being performed by that original candle, but they are not equal participants in the mitzvah. Hence, the additional Chanukah candles (which are only הִדוּר מצוה) may not be lit from the original Chanuka candle, which is the real deal.

See? Everything has its place... even egalitarianism. By the same token, everything also has not its place... perhaps especially egalitarianism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...