Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: You are Always Allowed to Daven for Yourself... Even for a Fly

I have, Baruch Hashem, bli ayin hara, puh-puh-puh, several very bright and adorable grandsons. I have one in particular who has an incredible eye for details. He recently told me that he had a question on Chumash, parshas Lech L'cha; the battle of the four kings vs the five kings. I told him to get a chumash and show me. As he was headed to the Mikra'os HaG'dolos, I redirected him to a regular chumash. (I mean, he's only seven. How complicated could this be?) He showed that in 14:2 and 14:8 the verses tell me that one of the kings was from Bela, which is now called Tzo'ar. Verse 14:3 says that they engaged in the battle in the valley of Siddim, which is the Dead Sea. Verse 14:8 also mentions that the battle was in the valley of Siddim... but does not mention that the valley of Siddim is the Dead Sea in that second verse. In all innocence, he asked why the new name was repeated for one place but not for the other.  I sent him back for the Mikra'os HaG'dolos.... I do have an approach; but it is way beyond the scope of this TftD.

I decided to try him out on halacha. Rabbi Fuerst, in his very popular and quite informative (as well as entertaining) Sunday morning shiur had addressed the question of whether or not one is permitted to daven that a fly should survive an accident and have a complete recovery. So I asked my grandson what he thought. He answered immediately an in extraordinarily cute innocence, "Of course! You have to have respect for all of HaShem's creations. So you can daven that he gets out of a spider's web or can just fly through it." I pointed out that the spider also has to live, so if you daven for that fly to live, you are davening for the spider to suffer. "Hmm... ok, you should daven that that fly should escape and a different fly -- who is old and about to die anyway -- should land in the web." My rejoinder was simple: Maybe that fly is the old one who is about to die?

I then agreed that one must, of course, have respect for all of HaShem's creations... but, is one ever allowed to kill a fly? What about if he is bothering you during davening? "Yes... you could kill him then.... but, wait... not on Shabbos!" Exactly. Of course, I hugged him.

The case was someone was davening on Shabbos and absentmindedly swatted away a fly. He then remembered it was Shabbos and realized what he had done! Then he saw the fly on the table/shtender (I don't have that detail...) down, but not out; its wings and/or legs were still moving. The question was: are you allowed to daven that the fly should not die (at least immediately) from it's wounds in order that the Jew will not have transgressed Shabbos. The answer was that you certainly are allowed to daven for the fly to live. After all, you don't really care about the fly; you are trying to avoid a serious Shabbos transgression. Someone asked R' Fuerst what name to use; R' Fuerst -- quick as ever -- pointed out that since the fly was right in front of you, there is not need to use a name; as when Moshe Rabeinu davened for his sister, Miriam.

Back to my grandson's first response. In truth, you do need to have respect for all of HaShem's creations. The mishna in Avos, in fact, says explicitly not to take anything in Creation for granted; it has a purpose for you. One foundation of avodas HaShem is that we, as Jews, are expected to never react, but to always act -- with a thought and planning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...