Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: More vs Deeper/Sharper/Beautifuler

First, a lesson in modern physics. There are many measurables that we use to characterize a physical object and its motion through space-time. Among these are mass, position, velocity, energy, charge, etc... etc... etc. Among these are groupings known as canonically conjugate variables: location/momentum (mass times velocity), time interval/energy transition, and more. The cool thing that was discovered with the age of modern physics in early 1900s was that the more precisely you measure one member of the pair, the more uncertainty you create in measuring the other member. Suppose, for example, you measure very precisely the position of a proton at one moment. You won't be able to predict where it is the next moment because you created an inherent uncertainty in its momentum (and therefore velocity). The universe just puts hard limits on what it will allow us to know about it.

"They" (you know who they are... the same ones who call it dope) say something like that about all sorts of things; among them: truth vs beauty, time vs money, quality vs quantity. You get, so they say, one at the expense of the other. I beg to differ. (Shocking; I know.)  Let's take "time vs money", for example. While still in graduate school, my research adviser revealed to me an important truth -- as valuable anything else I learned from him: the fastest way to do anything is slowly and carefully. Tried and True.

What about quality vs quantity? We've seen two examples where the highest quality comes, in fact, specifically with greater quantity: Shabbos/Chanuka candles, halacha following Beis Hillel. However, I know of two examples that seems to contradict that. First, the Mishna Brura says that fewer סליחות/penitential prayers with כוונה/intent is better than more סליחות without כוונה. Is that a contraindication to our conjecture? I think not. סליחות does not mean sounding out Hebrew letters. סליחות without כוונה are not low quality/high volume penitential prayers; it's just low quality noise. As further proof, the Mishna Brura goes on to say that, of course, more סליחות with כוונה is even better.

But there is another case: hilchos brachos. After specificity (more specific comes first), the next consideration is שלימות/wholeness/perfection, and only then comes size. If you were planning to eat one whole pea and one huge slice of watermelon, then you would make the bracha on the pea, because it is שָׁלֵם/whole; whereas the huge slice of watermelon is not שָׁלֵם. Is that a deviation? I don't think so; I think it a more precise fit to the bracha. The bracha for "the fruit of the ground", not "for pieces of fruit that come from the ground." In fact, if you have an almond and an apple, the bracha should be made on the apple -- because it is bigger, and even though you like almonds better.

What about truth vs beauty? This is an ancient canard. Shlomo HaMelech tells us that a beautiful women without sense is a gold ring in a sow's nose (Mishlei 11:20); and that grace is beauty is a deceitful vapor (Mishlei 31:30). Beauty is never anything but an adornment. Truth needs no adornment; it is beautiful. Beauty on anything else is a horrible lie.

So it is not time vs money, but most value comes from spending most time; not quality vs quantity, but quality because of quantity; not truth vs beauty, but beautiful because it is true. More is, ultimately, Deeper/Sharper/Beautifuler.

Two caveats: (1) There is a Torah way to spend your time, increase quantity, and search for Truth; Torah underlies everything. (2) Sorry... it really is location vs. momentum and time interval vs. energy transition; reality is, after all, reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...