Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Undoing the Effect of Stealing

You may already know this, but just to be clear: HaShem runs the world.  Obvious, right?  Well... the Chovos HaLevavos carries this to its logical conclusion and notes the following two facts.  If you are supposed to have something -- even something of great value -- then no one can prevent you from having it, nor can they take it away from you.  If, on the other hand, you are not suppose to have something -- even something of absolutely trivial value -- then there is no way you can keep it in your possession.

How then, you are wondering, is it possible to have steal anything?  In fact, how can stealing be an aveira?  Wait... how can there even be free will?!  Hang on, hang on... that, of course, is a ridiculously complex subject, but let's stick to our original question and a surface answer.  Stealing means taking someone else's stuff without their permission.  It doesn't matter that the thief couldn't have taken it and the victim couldn't have lost it unless HaShem wanted that to happen.  That's HaShem's issue.  The thief's issue is that he has stolen property in his possession and the Torah has prescribed a course for him to follow.  Theft is a lav sh'nitek l'asei; there is, however, a machlokes about precisely what is entailed in that asei.

The discussion storms around an interesting halachik anomaly known as "gezel ha'ger".  The Torah says that stolen property needs to be returned (that's our asei), but if the victim has died and has no relatives, then the property needs to be returned to HaShem via His agents, the kohanim.  How, wonders the gemara, is it possible that a Jew has no relatives?  After all, trace back far enough and all Jews come from Yaakov Avinu, right?  Oh, wait... right... it must be a ger who has no children; nebbuch.  So Shmendrick stole from our childless ger, whom we'll call Geiry.  Shmendrick hears that Geiry has died and feels badly about having stolen his cholent, so he heads up to Yerushalyim to return the value of the cholent ($15.37, with tax) to the kohanim.  On the way, he meets none other than... Geiry!  Shmendrick runs over to Geiry, who says, "Listen, I see you want to return the value of the cholent you stole.  I'll retroactively turn that into a $15.37 loan.  You just repay me, and we'll be even."  (Geirim are like that... they'll give you the shirt off their back.)   As Shmendrick is (with a tear of joy in his eye) reaching for his wallet, Geiry has a heart attack and dies.  "Great," thinks Shmendrick, "Now what do I do?!"

R' Yossi HaG'lili says that Shmedrick can keep the money.  Good ole Geiry corrected the theft by turning it (even retroactively) into a loan.  Now that Geiry is dead, all his property is hefkeir, Shmendrick has the money in his pocket, so he acquires it.  R' Akiva, though, says, "No way!  You haven't fixed up the sin until that money leaves your pocket!" (Bava Kama 109a)

So you are left with a machlokes tana'im.  My advice: don't steal from geirim; after all, some of my best friends are geirim.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…