Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: What They Say They Are Serving You vs What They Are Serving You

So... I was at Binny's and they were having a wine tasting for kosher wines. There were five bottles they were sampling. Cool. I was there early and they hadn't really started yet. I picked up a nice chardonnay and the nice lady asked me if I'd like a sample. Before I handed the bottle back to her, I noticed that the wine was not מבושל/cooked. The nice lady certainly was a Binny's employee; she was also most certainly not Jewish. You know me, smooth, delicate, always knows the right thing to say. So I said, "Actually, if you pour this, then I can't drink it." "Oh, right! They told me there were a couple of wines that I couldn't pour. I forgot! Thank you." As I had arrived as they were still setting up, I was able to open the bottle and then pour myself a sample (and actually bought a bottle of it). Then a Jewish, whom I had met before and knew was Jewish, arrived and took over.

I related the story, focusing on the non-mevushal aspect. Someone asked, though, suppose I had walked in later and saw the wines open for tasting. Would I be allowed to sample even the mevushal wines? After all, how do I know they didn't switch the bottle? In case your first reaction is to say/think, with some disdain, "Oh, puhleeze.... why would they do such a thing?", let me tell you a couple of stories.

My grandfather -- with whom I was very close and who was brilliant and had huge influence (which I think I say nearly every time I mention him; I miss him a lot) -- told me that in the old days (think late 1800s) the grinding methods left some impurities, bits of grit/stones/sand, in the flour. To prevent consumer fraud, there are legal limits on the maximum acceptable grit. As grinding methods got better, the flour get better. Nonetheless, the flour mills still added some sand, careful to stay below the legal limit, because sand was cheaper than flour. Until eventually the regulations caught up with the technology.

Second story: R' Fishbane of the CRC and AKO related that a Beis Yaakov student told him about a Dunkin Donuts in New Jersey that offered chalav yisroel for its kosher clientele. She was delighted and ordered a coffee with chalav yisroel milk. When he went to pour the milk -- which was behind a barrier and separated from the other milks and creamers -- discovered that it was empty. He told her, "Oh, don't worry." and proceeded to refill the chalav yisroel carton from the stahm milk. The young lady forwent her coffee that day.

Back to our wine tasting at Binny's. Wine is a much more kosher sensitive item than milk. So even if the wine is mevushal, how can you trust them?

Good question. I asked R' Fuerst. R' Fuerst told me that I needed to ask someone in hashgacha. R' Fishbane just happened to be there (I adore coincidences), so I asked him. (R' Fishbane actually initially directed me to R' Fuerst; I told him, "been there, done that" in a nice way.) R' Fishbane said that while wine is a generally much more kosher sensitive item, in this case they are letting you taste that wine to encourage you to buy it. The kind of people who buy the kind of wines they were offering would know the difference; if not right away, certainly when they  got home and sampled their purchase. It would be very bad business for Binny's to bait and switch the wine. Milk, on the other hand -- I am told by people who drink the stuff -- all tastes the same, more or less. (The editorial comment about the potability of milk is mine, not R' Fishbane.)

As usual:
  1. Nothing in the food service industry is as cut and dried as it seems.
  2. A non-expert cannot compare one situation to another.
  3. As a non-expert in halacha, I did not go straight to R' Fishbane, but first went to whom I always direct my halachic questions; the dayan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...