Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: What Made That Terrible Day So Bad and What Should We Learn From It?

Anyone who has been married for more than a couple of days knows there are ups and downs in any relationship. Anyone who has been married for several decades knows that the different pressures we endure during different stages of our life -- first married, starting to have children, building a career while paying for tuitions and camp, empty nesting, even -- I have heard -- some people have to get used to the husband retiring. Even the best and strongest marriages have endured difficult times. In fact, just as any other area of growth, those challenges are precisely what contributed to the strength of the marriage. That being said, there are some challenges that still make us uncomfortable years later. We are overjoyed that we were able to remain strong, but the mistakes can still haunt us as we strive to never make those kinds of mistakes again.

Our relationship with HaShem as His chosen nation is no different. We are living in galus now. Still His chosen nation, but still separating and living the consequences of the mistakes we made while working to repair the relationship so we can return home; May that be soon and in our lifetime. The annual commemoration of Tisha b'Av certainly reminds of the mistakes we made and the work we still have to do bring back the Beis HaMikdash; May it be rebuilt soon and in our lifetime. Nonetheless, to me, the sin of the golden calf feels so much more scary. On that day there was a palpable threat to our existence.

That's why I was shocked to learn (Shabbos 17a) of an event that Chazal described as קָשֶׁה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל כַּיּוֹם שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה בּוֹ הָעֵגֶל/difficult for Klal Yisrael as the day the calf was made. What?! Really?! The event?Shammai and Hillel had a disagreement. The talmidim stuck a sword in the entrance to the beis medrash and said, "Anyone can enter, but no one leaves." -- They wanted to force a vote then and there -- Hillel sat כפוף -- a posture of subordination -- like one of the talmidim in front of Shammai. That is what the gemara describes as קָשֶׁה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל כַּיּוֹם שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה בּוֹ הָעֵגֶל/difficult for Klal Yisrael as the day the calf was made. Rashi comments on the word קָשֶׁה/difficult: לפי שהלל נשיא וענוותן/because Hillel was the president and a humble person.

Ok... so if you had asked me before learning that gemara what was so bad about the day the golden calf was made, I certainly would have said the avoda zara, or at least the appearance of avoda zara. But... there is no avoda zara nor anything like it here. Moreover, I found that same expression -- קָשֶׁה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל כַּיּוֹם שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה בּוֹ הָעֵגֶל/difficult for Klal Yisrael as the day the calf was made -- describing when the sages were forced to translate the chumash into Greek. Now, though, I am forced to rethink that... along the lines of a great quote from H. L. Mencken: For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.

I have spent hours on this gemara. Looking through sources, discussing with talmidei chachamim, and just plain rolling everything over and over in my mind. There is a lot here. A profound depth that I feel needs more time. But at the core is a basic tension between חסד/grace/kindness and גבורה/valor/strength.

What happened on that day when the calf was made? Aaron HaKohen, the epitome of חסד/grace/kindness was passively subjugated to גבורה/valor/strength -- that is, Klal Yisrael did not stand up to the eruv rav to prevent a disastrous tragedy. What happened in beis medrash that day? Hillel, another icon of  חסד/grace/kindness is subordinated to Shammai, who represents גבורה/valor/strength. When the Written Torah -- the letter of the Law which is גבורה/valor/strength -- was translated into Greek, it was perforce separated from the Oral Torah -- the חסד/grace/kindness of HaShem's love for the world.

On that day in beis medrash, what finally happened? A vote was taken and the result was in favor of Shammai. However, Klal Yisrael did not accept the decree. Later the schools of Shammai and Hillel met to discuss the same issue, took a vote, and now the decree was accepted by Klal Yisrael.

Of course we need גבורה/valor/strength! But עוֹלָם חֶסֶד יִבָּנֶה/the world is built on grace and kindness (T'hillim 89:3).  חסד/grace/kindness can never be subordinate to גבורה/valor/strength.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...