Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Perfecting Ourselves, but Not at Someone Else’s Expense

This mishna in Yevamos (6:6, discussed on daf 61b/61a) says that a man needs to bring two children into this world in order to fulfill the mitzvah of "be fruitful and multiply". Technically, the mitzvah is to make reasonable efforts to have children. The Torah obligation continues until one has two children, but Chazal obligated a man to always endeavor to bring more children into the world. Beis Hillel says it needs to be one male and one female. Beis Shammai says you are good to go with two boys. As usual, we pasken like Beis Hillel, though in this case it leads to a stringency. So far so good.

Our sages, of course, were not arguing opinions, but bringing support for their position from precedent from the Oral and Written Law -- Our Holy Torah. Following Rashi, the essential points of discussion are as follows: Beis Shammai learns from Moshe Rabbeinu, who had two sons before he separated from his wife. Beis Hillel learns from the creation of the world, namely: HaShem created a man and a woman.

The gemara presses on both sides.  Why doesn't Beis Shammai learn from the creation of the world? Because we don't learn the possible from the impossible. Since it would be impossible to populate the world without both male and female, there is nothing to learn from that regarding our obligations nowadays. Cool. And why doesn't Beis Hillel learn from Moshe Rabbeinu? Because Moshe Rabbeinu had his own reasons for separating from his wife. It was one of the three things he did on his own, to which HaShem agreed with his decision. (The other two are adding an additional day of preparation for Matan Torah and breaking the first set of tablets.)

Since we pasken like Beis Hillel, we are left with this very uncomfortable conclusion: Moshe Rabbeinu did not fulfill the mitzvah of "be fruitful and multiply." This mitzvah applies even to non-Jews and was, in fact, given quite explicitly to the first two people. Moshe Rabbeinu, though, chose not to fulfill this mitzvah. Moshe Rabbeinu. The same Moshe Rabbeinu who davened 515 unique t'filos to be allowed into Eretz Yisrael. Why did Moshe Rabbeinu want so desperately to enter Eretz Yisrael? Chazal tell us -- because there are mitzvos that can only be performed in Eretz Yisrael. Moshe Rabbeinu ardently wanted to fulfill all the mitzvos of the Torah. In the end he only stopped davening because HaShem commanded him to stop.

But "be fruitful and multiply", Moshe Rabbeinu decided on his own to give up. What's up with that?

I don't know and I couldn't find anyone who discussed it. Here is a thought: Why did Moshe Rabbeinu separate from his wife? Because Moshe Rabbeinu -- unique among the prophets -- could be in communication with HaShem at any moment. Moshe Rabbeinu didn't want to ever be in the position of not being ready for a command performance. And why was that important? Why was that more important to Moshe Rabbeinu than to all the other prophets and even to our exalted Avos? I would like to suggest: because the entire Torah we have -- Written and Oral -- is wholly and only from Moshe Rabbeinu, Moshe Rabbeinu was ardent in his desire to perfect himself in all dimensions; to perform all of the mitzvos of the Torah. 515 t'filos to have a few more opportunities.

But Klal Yisrael needed Moshe Rabbeinu to be ready at any moment for an audience with the Creator of the World. Moshe Rabbeinu sincerely and ardently sought perfection and completion, but not at the expense of depriving nor even delaying Klal Yisrael from a single dimension of Torah.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...