Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: מוקצה is an All Day Affair

I know the title is more cutesy than usual.  In this case, the cutesiness is just gravy because the title expresses precisely what I want to express.  Deal.

There are several misconception about מוקצה, but a few stand out.  For example, people think it is forbidden touch מוקצה.  Nope; it is only forbidden to move מוקצה.  Note, however, that if the movement is a פסיק רישא/inevitable consequence and that itself could cause a violation of Shabbos (such as touching a hanging oil lamp), then the touching itself is also forbidden.  Other than that, go ahead and touch that hammer and pricey Lladro.

Here's another one: no problem moving the מוקצה item if you need it's place (hey!  I want to sit there!) or the item itself for something permissible (Honey, if you can't find that darn nutcracker again... just use the hammer. ).  Well... not so fast there Quicksdraw!  That rule is only true for a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור/a tool/utensil whose main function is for a labor forbidden on Shabbos/Yom Tov but which can also be used for permissible stuff.  (See how much more precise and compact the Holy Tongue is?)  So you certainly may move a hammer, but not a coin.  Even if you want to crack a nut with that silver dollar (good luck, by the way), you still can't use money, because money is not a utensil nor tool, it is therefore in the category of מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically מוקצה.

Now to today's core topic.  There is a general rule that something that was מוקצה from before and throughout the onset of Shabbos remains מוקצה for the entire Shabbos.  Classic example of this is Shabbos candelabra; since the candles were burning throughout twilight and the candelabra is supporting the candles that are supporting a flame -- which is מוקצה מחמת גופו -- therefore the candelabra is מוקצה for the entire Shabbos.  Correspondingly, if something was perfectly fine before and during the onset of Shabbos, but then became מוקצה on Shabbos, and then whatever attribute made it מוקצה was also removed on Shabbos, then the item itself is also no longer מוקצה.  Whew... the classic example of this is a towel that gets sopping wet on Shabbos (left in yard and it rained overnight, מוקצה because of fear or wringing it which is either a problem of laundering or squeezing), then becomes dry again; that towel can now be used for drying dishes and babies in the late afternoon heat once it becomes dry.

Now you'll ask me: That being the case, smart guy, why does the Taz (Yoreh Dei'ah, 266, sk 1) say that the mohel must be very careful after a bris on Shabbos to only move the איזמל/bris knife to one secure place -- because after the bris the איזמל is מוקצה!  Isn't that a case of מוקצה for only part of Shabbos?  I'll answer you... just give me a minute... or a day... hmm... interesting... ah!

No, that case does not violate the rule that we don't have partial מוקצה days.  The issue here is that the איזמל is מוקצה all day.  (WHAT?! But the mohel moved it around to do the bris!! .)  Yes, the word מוקצה means "set aside", not "immovable".  The איזמל is הוקצה למצוותו/set aside for its mitzvah.  Of course you can move the איזמל to do the bris -- and nothing else -- because it is precisely for that purpose that it was set aside.

Oh, by the way... the Taz adds that the mohel is allowed to move the איזמל after the bris because if here were not allowed to secure his precious (and expensive) איזמל, then he would not want to do the bris at all.  When Chazal created an exception out of concern that without the exception people would be really stuck is a topic all of its own.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...