Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: ברוך השם Does Not Mean, "Thank G-d!"

As you may recall, I do not like answering queries about my well-being with the simple statement of faith: ברוך השם.  As many of my friends (and ex-friends, I suppose) know, I also don't like being answered that way.  When I answer non-Jews (except Christine and Ross, may he rest in peace), I pretty much give the same response; except that I substitute "Thank G-d" for ברוך השם.  Which brings us to today's thought.  "Thank G-d" is a a reasonable substitute for ברוך השם -- meaning that it satisfies the requirements of giving a real answer to the query and doesn't require any additional explanation -- but is not a translation of ברוך השם.

So... what does ברוך השם literally (more or less...) mean?  How is it used?  Why do we use that phrase/concept for those use cases?

Translating the word ברוך is harder than translating השם, but much easier to understand why we use it.  The word השם simply mean, "The name/reputation" ("The Name/Reputation", if you prefer; though the Hebrew alphabet has no concept of capital and lower case letters.)  The word ברוך is nearly always translated as "blessed".  I have no clue why that is, as the an exhaustive search of the internet (meaning I typed "bless definition" into the search box and scanned the top dozen or so hits) bears no relation to what the word means.  The Hebrew word ברוך is from the same root as the words בריכה/pool (of water) and ברך/knee.  The verb לברך means to provide an overflowing abundance (the pool connection) of goodness to the point that the receiver is totally dependant on and subservient (as in, "I bend my knee to you, Oh Lord") to the one who confers said goodness.  ברוך, then, is simply the noun form, meaning the One and Only source of all goodness upon whom we are completely dependent and subservient.

Cool.  And השם?  Why not the generic word for G-d or Lord or Master or Creator?  Well, first please note that the Hebrew word for G-d really just means "the source of all power and control".  Pretty much a drop in replacement for what we now call "physical law".  We have so many words to refer to G-d/Lord/Creator/etc because we can only know Him through His interactions with the world and using the concepts that He has given us.  We have no word nor term nor even concept for what is behind that interaction.  We, as created beings cannot -- even in principle -- really know anything about our Creator.  Instead, we are honest in our limitations and always refer to Him via the interaction to which we are responding or addressing.  Generically, we use the term השם to to refer to whatever interaction is appropriate.

Therefore, the term ברוך השם at once acknowledges that there is only one source of all good, that it is overflowing in abundance, that we are totally dependent on it, and that we declare our subservience to a Being (even that word is wrong, as being-ness is also a creation) that we cannot really understand at all.  We use that term where the non-Jewish word uses the term "Thank G-d", therefore, for obvious reasons.  But we also use that term when some horrible tragedy occurs.  There is no contradiction for us.  Since we know that we are only in this world for a short time and it is only a preparation for our real/eternal life, we acknowledge that whether is feels good or bad to us, we know with clarity that it is for ultimate good; !ברוך השם

See why I just say, "I am doing fine, thank G-d" and don't try to explain each time what is meant by ברוך השם?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק