Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Becoming Stupid and Reckless when Angry; Punishment or Reality?

Let's review: Anger: bad, really bad.

One of the things that happens with anger is that the angry person loses his wisdom and common sense.  (Which is a more politically correct way of saying that when you get mad, you get stupid and reckless.  We all know how important it is to me to be politically correct.)  The question is, though, whether that loss is a punishment for being angry or just the nature of the beast -- that anger is simply incompatible with wisdom.

Let's make that more concrete and less philosophical, ok?  My three year old granddaughter grabbed a spray bottle of Simple Green, a relatively non-toxic all purpose cleaner right before dinner.  I told her to put it down.  She waited till I washed for bread and knew I couldn't talk (they're very clever, especially when they are pushing the envelope), grabbed the spray bottle again and sprayed herself square in the face.  I grabbed the bottle and then her... her littlehands immediately flew back to protect you pahtch zone, but to no avail.  The pahtch was a punishment; meant, of course, to prevent her from disobeying and spraying herself with, chas v'shalom, something worse.  Any eye irritation was not punishment, just the nature of spraying herself in the eyes with cleanser.  (I, of course, was not angry, just really scared.  She is and was fine, Baruch HaShem.)

So... is the stupidity and reckless behaviour that comes with anger a result of spraying your soul in the face with toxic waste, or is it a pahtch from HaShem?  What difference does it make?  After all, since we know "Anger: bad, really bad", just don't get angry.  Right... let me know how that works for you.

So here's one practical difference:  Can I work on my anger issues just by becoming wiser, or do I need to work on eradicating the anger so I won't get punished with removal of whatever paltry sum of wisdom that I have managed to amass?  (The terms "paltry sum" and "amass" don't really seem to go together, do they?)  If the former, then it doesn't matter if I learn gemara, halacha, mishna, etc; just increasing the intensity and/or quantity of learning will leave less room for anger.  If the latter, though, I better really stop up the learning of mussar and maybe practice calming exercises.

Here's another difference: If anger is a punishment, then getting angry for the sake of a mitzvah should not incur that punishment.  On the other hand, if it is just reality, then I better carefully consider getting angry even for the sake of a mitzvah.  Like running into a burning building to save a baby... you better be darn sure there is a baby in that conflagration (and not, for instance, a cat), because you are going to get burned.  It may very well be worth weeks of painful recovery to save that baby, but probably not worth it to save a cat.

So what's the answer?  I know you'll be shocked... but it's a מחלוקת; a matter of dispute among our sages of all ages.  The only prudent route is to be stringent like both opinions.  Increase intensity and quantity of learning all topics, but don't forget the daily mussar.  Also, the Ramban does give tool that he says is extraordinarily effective: always speak softly.

Interestingly, I have found that learning the intense debate among our sages regarding whether loss of wisdom is a punishment or simply that Torah wisdom and anger are incompatible has been very effective in calming me down.  In learning the arguments, one see with ever more clarity just how shockingly bad anger really is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק