Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Moving Stuff in a Public Domain on Shabbos

There are lots of jokes like this: Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, an honest lawyer, and an old drunk were walking along when they simultaneously spotted a hundred-dollar bill laying in the street. Who gets it?  The old drunk, of course, the other three are mythological creatures.  (My apologies to all of the honest lawyers... hello... anyone there?)

Imagine you live in a community where there is no machlokes about the eiruv and so everyone agrees where the public domain (רשות הרבים) is.  The halacha is that one may -- לכתחילה -- move stuff within a perimeter of four אמות/cubits.  (I looked for a better word than "stuff".  The only word that even came close was "paraphernalia", and no one my age who went to college can keep a straight face when using that word.  I'm sticking with "stuff".)  There are a few interesting issues regarding just that simple halacha.  First, just how big is that cubit?  Second, we have a general principle of חצי שיעור אסור מדאורייתא, so why is one allowed to carry even two cubits, let alone up to four?

The source of this halacha is a verse in the Torah (Shmos 16:29), שְׁבוּ אִישׁ תַּחְתָּיו/each person should remain in his place.  This was said on Shabbos and we learn from here that a person has his own space (not just a 60s pop-psychology term).  Our sages determined that a person needs a perimeter of three cubits in which to sit, and he needs another cubit to stretch out his arms and legs; bottom line: the Torah prescribes that each person has a four cubit space that is deemed "his".  (Mishna Brura 34791, sk 1)

How big is that four cubits?  If you do a Google search, you will find that a cubit is 45.72 centimeters/18 inches.  Of course, there is no one universally accept number, but they all fall between about 16 and 22 inches.  No matter how you slice it, though, very few of us are three of those cubits tall.  I, for example, am taller than three times even that largest cubit.  In reality, though, when our sages made that estimation, they were making it for an average person and according to his cubit.  That is, his forearm, from elbow to end of middle finger; hence the name אַמָה, which is also the name of the middle finger in Hebrew.)  That being the case, the space of each person is really according his size.  Interestingly, that is only for moving things around.  To be culpable for transporting something further that four cubits in a public domain, one would have to move that object more than four regular cubits (not sized to him).  So Tom Thumb would only be allowed to move things a few inches or less (depending on which fairy tale you read), Hagrid could move stuff several feet more than you or I, but all of us would only be culpable if we through (or otherwise transported) stuff more than six to eight feet.

What about the problem of חצי שיעור אסור מדאורייתא?  There are a couple of approaches to that.  The Chavos Yair says that this is explicitly exempt from that rule.  The whole business is a גזירת הכתוב/decree of the text; you are given four cubits and that's that.  The Pri M'gaden, on the other hand, says that moving something less that four cubits just doesn't have the name "transporting".  The halacha of חצי שיעור אסור מדאורייתא is only applicable when you can actually do part of a malacha (or eat part of a forbidden substance).  The malacha of "transporting", however, is all or nothing.

Can you tell I started learning the fourth volume of Mishna Brura?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...