Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Moving Objects On Shabbos Comes In Two Flavors

The עירוב; much maligned, much abused.  Here are two of my favorite quotes (and my responses):
  • Oh yes, I know that R' SuchAndSuch, shlita/ztz"l doesn't believe in eiruvs [sic].
    • Response: Hmmm... Given that there is a masechta eiruvin, I am pretty darn sure that R' SuchAndSuch, shlita/ztz"l, does actually believe in עירובים just as much as he believes in kashrus.  Maybe it is his knowledge of the issue that is the source of his concerns?
  • I really don't know what the issues are with the eiruv, so I just use it.
    • Response: Hmmm... In case of doubt about a Torah prohibition, the rule is always to stringent.  Using ignorance as an excuse to risk spiritual excision seems as reckless as walking along the Grand Canyon with your eyes closed.
The problem is, of course, that people are all fired up that they are in broadcast mode before any discussion begins, so there is no dialog; only a lot of shouting.  My first Shavous in Dallas, the rabbi proposed that we discuss the Torah viewpoint on abortion.  Everyone agreed that would be interesting, and one fellow in particular was excited to show the rabbi the error of his ways.  When the rabbi walked in on Shavuous night, he said that we first needed to lay out the underlying issues.  Three or four hours later we had finally finished prerequisite materials.  What about Mr. ShowTheRabbiTheErrorOfHisWays?  After only an hour or so, it had become very clear to him  that his opinions were based on misconceptions and half-truths.  Faced with the shocking realization that he would need to alter his opinions if he took actual facts into account, he had left.

In that spirit, I would like to steadily develop a base of facts before actually formulating opinions about this or that עירוב.  Siman 346 develops the basic parameters in which all discussions of עירובים.  There are two distinct issues with carrying items on Shabbos that are problematic (read: forbidden) at the Torah level.

We need two definitions prior to stating the halacha: רשות היחיד/private domain and רשות הרבים/public domain.  Please note well that these terms have nothing to do with ownership.  A private domain -- at the Torah level -- is area enclosed by fences/walls, regardless of size.  There is a discussion about how this definition is affected by man-made vs naturally occurring (such as steep mountain sides and rivers/oceans) and also by the number of people crossing daily; but that's the basic idea.  A public domain is an open area that either has or could support (that's a BIG discussion) a daily throng of 600,000 people.

Issue #1 (in no particular order): Transporting an object between public and private domains.  The mode of transportation is irrelevent: carrying, throwing, or handing over; regardless of the direction, from public to private domain or from the private to public domain; in all cases the transportation is forbidden by the Torah.  Notice that there is no minimum or maximum distance; it is the crossing of the boundary itself that is forbidden.

Issue #2 (ditto on the order thing): Transporting an object more than four cubits (the ever popular ד' אמות -- irrelevant aside: Google translate got that exactly right!) in a public domain is forbidden by the Torah.  Interestingly, transporting an object up to (but not including) four cubits is completely permissible; both at the Torah and even Rabbinic levels.

Now... since these are Torah prohibitions, there is nothing that can be done to permit them.  That would be boring, so Chazal added their own prohibitions: (1) to and from and through a new domain (the כרמלית, a sort of pseudo public domain), and (2) crossing boundaries of any two domains (even one private to another).  Since Chazal forbad, Chazal can permit; enter (drum roll please...) the עירוב!  Now, as they say, the fun begins.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...