Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: טהרה and טומאה and Cholent Friday Night

Chazal (as brought in mascechta Shabbos) decreed that non-Jews carry a certain level of טומא.  Now a days that fact of no real practical importance because we are all טמא anyway.  Back in the day, though, when we were careful about טהרה and טומאה, this decree had as big an impact as the fact that now a days Jewish men are not allowed physical contact -- including shaking hands -- with women (other than wife and daughters, of course).  In fact, Chazal made the decree to prevent the Jewish children from getting to close with certain elements of the non-Jewish world from whom they could learn bad (and decidedly non-Jewish) behaviors.

I found this decree fascinating because we have several decrees that lead to stringencies that we observe even though the original reason is no longer applicable.  Second day of Yom Tov, for example; even though we know precisely when the new moon occurs each month, none the less we still keep a second day of Yom Tov because of the original decree of םפקא דיומא.  In this case, though, the reason for the decree is certainly just as (or even more) applicable today as then, yet the intended effect is no longer achieved.  I asked R' Fuerst, shlita, and he told me that Chazal were precise in the method they chose to achieve the desired result.  Had our Sages wanted to keep more barriers in all situations, they certainly could have.  Here, however, they (apparently) felt that it was only important to keep that extra level of separation when we (Klal Yisrael) are at a high enough spiritual level that תהרה and טומא and important to us.

That concept leads to a very practical question regarding preparing cholent for Friday night.  How so?  In order to have hot cholent on Shabbos, then before the onset of Shabbos it must either be completely cooked (i.e., enough to be edible) - or - it has to contain completely raw meat.  The logic behind the two seemingly contradictory approaches is actually one idea: to take your mind of stirring it to hasten the cooking.  If it is completely cooked there is no reason to stir because there is nothing to hasten; it has arrived.  If it has raw meat in it, then it won't be ready tonight no matter how vigorously it is stirred.  In both cases, you are relaxed and have taken your mind off the cooking cholent till tomorrow's s'uda (yum!).  See Mishna Brura 253, sk 9, 10, 11, and Biur Halacha there.

Today, however, our cholent pots are quite hot and our meat is quite tender; you can certainly cook up a nice pot of cholent in just a few hours.  So... was the original p'sak halacha just good advice that now a days is not longer relevant and therefore the whole raw meat thing doesn't work, or was it the reflection of a decree?

Surprise!  It's a machlokes among the modern poskim.  R' Henken (brought in R' Ribiat's book; the "silver" set) says the whole heter is no longer relevant.  R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and R' Elyashiv (as brought by the Dirshu Mishna Brura) both learned the Biur Halacha has meaning it is good advice for the way most people eat Friday night; so if you plan to eat right away, then the heter of raw meat works, but if you plan to wait a few hours (for whatever reason) then it doesn't work.  The Chazon Ish (also brought by Dirshu) argues on the Mishna Brura and holds that throwing raw meat into the cholent right before sunset is a decree like any other.

So... if you think you might sometime want to ask your wife to suddenly whip up a Cholent a 1/2 hour before Shabbos because you just invited some buddies over for beer and cholent later than night.... I suggest you (1) CYLOR now to know how he paskens and (2) rethink how well springing this on your wife at the last minute is going to go for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...