Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Bracha of בורא עצי בשמים

It is part of nusach S'fard to read the ingredients of the קטורת/incense every morning.  Nusach Ashkenaz only reads it on Shabbos and Yom Tov.  I understood the Mishna Brura to say that even us Ashkenazim are allowed to read the קטורת every day, and it is even laudable; so I do.  Some of the spices (ok, smart guy, one of the spices) is something I recognize: cinnamon.  But  stacte, onycha, galbanum, frankincense,  myrrh, cassia, and spikenard... well, I really have no clue.  (Truthfully, spikenard and frankincense sound creepy to me.)  If you are ever thinking about what to get the chareidi man who has no sense of style, try this: Frankincense, Myrrh , Spikenard, Hyssop, Cedarwood, and Cinnamon essential oils  (it comes as a set).  If you want, you can add Jasmine as extra credit.

Enjoying pleasant aromas, like any other pleasure from this world, require a bracha before partaking.  Interestingly, many of us only run across this issue on Saturday night when making havdala.  One of "stars of the show" is the bracha of בורא מיני בשמים and the passing of the spice jar.  Truthfully, though, there are different brachos for different categories of aromas, just as there are different brachos for different categories of foods.  בורא מיני בשמים is sort of the שהכל of aromas.

For example, there is בורא עשבי בשמים for aromatic herbs and grasses.  That is actually the appropriate bracha to make when smelling most flowers.  There is בורא עצי בשמים for aromatic עצים.  That is the proper bracha for roses, which are actually "trees", as the do not die each year; they just lose their foliage and flowers at the end of the season and then produces new growth the next year.  I suppose you are wondering why I didn't translate עצים.  Great question!

This all came up because I am learning masechta brachos and on page 43a/b the gemara discusses the appropriate bracha on כשרתא and סמלק.  Rashi translates כשרתא as קושט (one of the spices in the קטורת -- Oh!  That's what that story at the beginning has to do with all this.  Kinda stretching there, aren't you, Allen?) and which Art Scroll translates as costus.  Rashi translates סמלק into Arabic as יסמי''ן and which we recognize immediately as jasmine.  As you probably already know (you can check out the Wikipedia links if you don't), both costus and jasmine are perennials; that is, the plant produces flowers, sends out its seeds, then dies.  They are in no way, shape, or form trees.  Yet the gemara clearly states that the appropriate bracha on each is בורא עצי בשמים!  We have one of two choices: we don't have the correct translation for either כשרתא/קושט nor סמלק/יסמי''ן -OR- we don't have the correct translation for עצים in the bracha of בורא עצי בשמים.

Art Scroll cites a couple of rishonim and a Biur Halacha (216).  I went to look at the Biur Halacha... it's one of those scary long ones.  I fortified myself with another cup of coffee and went at it.  The Biur Halacha quotes same rishonim, plus more, plus a couple of gaonim and then tops it off with some acharonim for good measure.  At the end of the day (which it pretty much was by that time), there is a machlokes about how to translate the word עצים in the bracha of בורא עצי בשמים.  Some translate it the same way we translate עצים  in the bracha of בורא פרי העץ; in which case they say that we don't really know the translation of the spices mentioned in the gemara.  The other groups says that one should translate this bracha as "aromatic woody plants", in which case it applies quite nicely to jasmine and costus.

The Biur Halacha concludes that the appropriate bracha on these spices and herbs is בורא מיני בשמים.  That is, don't get involved with a machlokes when you don't have to.  Sound advice when entering a new week.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...