Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Counting S'fira, T'mi'mous, and Being Motzi When You Can't Be Yotzi

If you did not count s'firas ha'omer for one complete day, that you can no longer count with a bracha.  You should, of course, continue counting.  This is one of those situations where it is very important to have clarity on what you are doing and all of its parts.

On this there is no machlokes: When we have the Beis HaMikdash (may it be rebuilt soon and in our days), there is a mitzvah d'oraisa for each Jewish man to count s'firas ha'omer himself.  There is also a mitzvah d'rabanan for counter to make a bracha before performing said mitzvah; just as there is for many mitzvos.  You can't have someone motzi you in the counting (the Torah says each individual must count for himself), but you can be yotzi with someone else's bracha (though the minhag is for everyone to say the bracha himself).  Whether the mitzvah of counting now a days is d'oraisa or d'rabanan, whether women are obligated (the Ramban holds this is not a mitzvas asei sh'z'man gram/time-bound positive mitzvah) are all interesting discussions; for another time, perhaps.

There is one very deep machlokes left: the mitzvah requires "t'mi'mus"/wholeness.  That could mean either: [1] all 49 days need to be counted in order to have fulfilled the mitzvah, or it could mean that: [2] on each day the counting needs to be done as close to the beginning of the day as possible.  We are nervous for both sides.  In any doubtful situation, count without a bracha because of the overarching principle of "safeik d'rabanan l'kula".  If you don't count at night, count during the day (since t'mi'mus might mean [1]) without a bracha (since t'mi'mus might mean [2]).  If you don't count one whole day, then count the rest of the days  (since t'mi'mus might mean [2]) without a bracha (since t'mi'mus might mean [1]).

Now then... suppose you are the ma'ariv shaliach tzibur and have missed a day of counting; so you certainly cannot make a bracha for yourself.  However, it can be embarrassing to say, "Hey everyone, I forgot to count one day... so someone else is going to have to actually make the bracha."  Don't worry, says R' Tzvi Pesach Frank (Mikra'ei Kodesh, Pesach 2) and R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Halichos Shlomo, Pesach 11:7), just ask (privately) a member of the congregation (who is still counting with a bracha) to not make the bracha himself, but let you be motzi him (he should answer amein, but that's not an absolute requirement).  So you, as shaliach tzibur, can make the bracha and count as usual and only one's the wiser.  Apparently that actually happened to the Beis haLeivi one year and that's what he did.

[If anyone is interested in the lumdus, I am happy to go through it; just don't have time in this post.]

Paskening sha'eilos from s'farim is fraught with danger; don't do it.  I am rarely shaliach tzibur (I daven too slowly to be anyone's shaliach) and I don't usually forget (I have both an app and a wife to remind me), but it could happen.  So I called R' Fuerst just now and he said, "Yes, you can do that l'chatchila."  Whew.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...