Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Attaching Conditions to Mitzvah Fulfillment

It's not uncommon to hear on Friday afternoon, "I'll light candles al t'nai that I am accepting Shabbos later."  The statement doesn't mean "on condition", but "according to the conditions herewith expressed."  The point is that mitzvah observance is mediated by kavana/intent.  There are basically three ways you can go with this: kavana b'feirush (explicit intention), stam kavana (eh... que sera, sera), and kavana l'hepech (oh, no, I certainly do not mean that to take effect).

The Friday afternoon ritual is required because women have a long standing tradition of accepting Shabbos with their candle lighting.  If a women is running late, however, she can have kavana l'hepech that this act of lighting not be connected to her acceptance of Shabbos.

A similar t'nai is commonly used for eiruv tavshilin.  The rav of the city will make his eiruv earlyish on erev Yom Tov with the condition to include anyone who does not have an eiruv of his own before Yom Tov due to forgetting (due to being busy, not out of laziness), or unforeseen circumstances (a rat eats eat, for example; no, not his pet rat, Willard's rats).  That condition specifically excludes those who made an eiruv of their own (or who willfully neglected to make one) and allows them to therefore make a bracha on their own.

Making a tanai should be done, generally speaking, only b'di'avad.  There are reasons, after all, that mitvah observance has been done a certain way.  The candle lighting scenario, for example; there is the shitah of the Aruch that Shabbos actually starts 18 minutes before sundown.  That means that to get "tosafos shabbos" (adding onto Shabbos from the weekday) and the shitas haAruch, one really needs to light 20 minutes before sh'kiyah.  The real takanah of eiruv tavshilin is for each household to make their own in order to really start their Shabbos preparations before Yom Tov.

Sometime, however, the t'nai can even be l'chatchila. S'firas ha'omer, for example.  It is really too early to count (l'chatchila) right after the ma'ariv that comes on the heels of sh'kiyah.  On the other hand, it is sooo easy to forget later when one is alone.  The advice, therefore, is to make a t'nai that the counting I am doing now is with intent not to fulfill the mitzvah (kavana l'hepech), unless I forget to count later, then this counting retroactively should be considered as my counting (with kavana b'feirush).  That way you are covered on both sides.

One thing you can't do is to try to address the s'feika d'yoma issue by saying, "If Pesach was really on the our first day, then today is 22 days which is 3 weeks and one day of the omer, but it Pesach was really on our second day, then today is 21 days which is 3 weeks of the omer."  That doesn't work because you never really counted at all.  Counting with a t'nai is counting; expressing doubt about today is this or that just isn't counting.

Clear?  I know, I know... it depends...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...