Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Why Stealing An Animal for a Korban Doesn't Work, But Conversion Does

Some days you just know they just checked off on item on that great Task List in the Sky of things you are supposed to accomplish in this world.  I've had a question for years, going back to my emergence from the mikvah on Aug 7, 1990.  There is a mitzvas asei m'di'oraisah to convert.  We learn many of its halachos from Rus, many others from klal yisrael as they prepared to accept the Torah at Har Sinai.  My question has been: exactly who can fulfill that mitzvah?  The goy entering the mikvah can't, because... well, he's a goy!  The Jew emerging from the mikvah can't, because... well, he's already Jewish!  This morning, HaShem explained it to me.

I sat down across from my chavrusa and said (as as I usually do), "I wonder what HaShem wants to reveal to us today."  I heard once that davening is talking to HaShem and learning is HaShem talking to you; I find it a lot easier to pay attention when He's doing the talking, actually.  We opened our gemaras to find ourselves poised to tackle a tosafos (Bava Kama 67a, d.h. amar ulla, mi'nayin l'yi'ush sh'eino koneh) that started half way down the daf and continued most of the way down the next.  Not for the faint of heart.

The gemara quotes Ulla as asking, "from where do we know that the owner's despair of ever seeing his item again [aka, yi'ush] does not transfer ownership to the theif?"  Says Rabeinu Tam, one can infer from here that Ulla holds that yi'ush alone is not enough to allow the robber to acquire.  (That made me uneasy, because it sure seems to me that Ulla is saying that straight out, I don't need to infer anything!  Obviously Rabeinu Tam has something up his sleeve.)  Rabeinu Tam pulls another gemara out of his sleeve, Gittin 55a, where Ulla explains that a stolen animal that is sanctified as a korban is not effective in securing a kapara, because it is a mitzvah ha'ba b'aveira -- a mitzvah that was executed with the help of a forbidden act (stealing the animal).  Hang on, exclaims Rabeinu Tam: Ulla is telling us that except for that technicality, the korban would have worked.  But that means that animal belonged to the theif (you can't sanctify some one else's stuff ) and it must have been after yi'ush (since before yi'ush that is not basis whatsoever for a property transfer), and so ... drum roll please ... one can infer from that gemara that Ulla holds that yi'ush does effect a property transfer.  How do we resolve this apparent contradiction?

Both Rabeinu Tam and the R"i conclude that Ulla holds that yi'ush alone does not work to transfer ownership except in one case.  The disagree, of course, as to what that one case is.  Rabeinu Tam says that if the action is intended for a mitzvah, then the Torah grants a leniency to transfer the ownership.  The R"i says the reason for the leniency is because the action changes the categorization of the object; before it was chullin (ordinary meat on the hoof), now it is hekdesh (holy cow, as it were).

So according to Rabeinu Tam, the Torah grants the goy the opportunity to do a mitzvah because the action he wants to perform is specifically to gain the opportunity to do mitzvos.  According to the R"i, the Torah grants the goy the ability to do a mitzvah because the action will change his category from goy to Jew.

I can hardly wait to see what the Creator of the world has to say to me tomorrow!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...