Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Striving to be Wealthy, Powerful, and Glorious

I don't know about you, but when I think about someone who epitomizes the result of a life long pursuit of wealth, power, and glory, I think about no one other than Daffy Duck.  The seminal documentary on this subject being a cartoon where Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck were on their way to a vacation in Bermuda, but a wrong turn at Albekoikey brought them into the cave of wonders.  Daffy Duck immediately proclaimed himself owner of all he could see ("mine!  mine!  mine!  It's all mine!!") and beyond.  By the end of the epic, Daffy Duck had been reduced to the size of a bug, still proclaiming "mine! mine! mine!", and Bugs Bunny was relaxing in Bermuda.  The obvious message that pursuit of wealth, power, and glory is worse than vain -- it is tragically destructive -- was not lost on me.  (What?  You don't analyze cartoons like that?  Really?  Hmm...)

Yet Chazal seem to say something quite different.  (Shocking, right?)   Chazal not only laud the pursuit of wealth, power, and glory; they actually lay out a course to achieve them.  In the first mishna of the fourth perek of Pirkei Avos, ben Zoma explains how to be wealthy, powerful, and glorious.  Don't for a moment think that ben Zoma is talking to low people who cannot control their urges and so he is giving them a b'di'avad path to vent their low cravings.  First of all, the phrasing of the mishna is l'chatchila.  Not "if you (nebbich) want to be wealthy, then here's a way to control that destructive urge."  Oh no.  ben Zoma proclaims, "Who is wealthy?  Who is powerful? Who is glorious?"; this is the summary of a lecture on the importance of those attributes.  Moreover, the first advice from ben Zoma is how to achieve wisdom.  Surely no one considers the pursuit of wisdom as anything but the highest level of human achievement.

Upon further consideration, I see that the laughable and even tragic figure portrayed by Daffy Duck is not mistaken.  Ben Zoma does not tell us how to have wisdom, wealth, power, and glory; rather he tells us how to be wise, wealthy, powerful, and glorious.  Having those things rather than being those things is the difference between Bilaam haRasha and Moshe Rabeinu.  HaShem built us with an overwhelming and insatiable desire for wisdom, wealth, power, and glory.  As Shlomo haMelech tells us in Koheles 5:9: "ohev kesef lo yisbah kesef" -- one who love money is (never) satisfied with money.  Who epitomized that sentiment?  Chazal tell us that is Moshe Rabeinu.

Maybe I can't be Moshe Rabeinu, but I can certainly strive not to be Daffy Duck.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...