Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Different Ways of Stating the Same Thing is Fundamental to Understanding

You probably remember from somewhere during your life in science hearing that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.  You probably know that is the explanation of the recoil felt when shooting a gun and that is has something to do with how rocket ships and missiles work.

You may or may not have taken enough science to have heard that momentum is conserved.  It is a reasonably technical detail that turns out to be very important if you want to really understand how physics works.  If you don't and are living a fulfilling life just trusting that physics does work, then you really don't need to think much more about it.

I am reasonably certain that no science teacher (or anyone else, for that matter) said to you, "I have a very, very important principle of physics to tell you: if you do the same experiment in two different places, you'll get the same result!"  To put it in more concrete terms: your car works that same in front of your house and in front of Kol Tuv.  (For you non-Chicagoans, Kol Tuv is one of the most reliable kosher grocery stores in the world; no exaggeration.)  In any case, your reaction is probably much closer to "Duh!" then "WOW!"

In fact, however, these three statements are exactly the same.  Exactly.  If there was the slightest difference between the action and the reaction, then you would need a different kind of computer for home and for school.  If your car worked differently in front of Kol Tuv than your house, then momentum would not be conserved.  The technical details and the global consequences are one in the same.

The gemara (Bava Kama 57-58) relates perfectly reasonable facts:

  1. R' Dosa would declare as hefker anything that had been gleaned from his field.  R' Dosa would do that in case any of the ani'yim accidently picked up something that was not considered "leket"/gleanings.
  2. The tz'nuyim (modest/pious ones) would set aside money to automatically redeem produce taken from their 4th year vineyards (which must be eaten in Yerushalayim).  They did that to save anyone from coming to sin because of them.
Comes along R' Yochanan and tells us that R' Dosa and the tz'nuyim were doing the same thing.  The gemara there spends some time analyzing R' Yochanan's statement and its implications.  Knowing these are the same, in fact, has even broader application than the statements themselves.

The Derech HaShem says that unless you understand not only the topics in an area of research, but also their interrelationships, then you don't understand the topic.  Reality is quite the research topic, don't you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...