Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Different Ways of Stating the Same Thing is Fundamental to Understanding

You probably remember from somewhere during your life in science hearing that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.  You probably know that is the explanation of the recoil felt when shooting a gun and that is has something to do with how rocket ships and missiles work.

You may or may not have taken enough science to have heard that momentum is conserved.  It is a reasonably technical detail that turns out to be very important if you want to really understand how physics works.  If you don't and are living a fulfilling life just trusting that physics does work, then you really don't need to think much more about it.

I am reasonably certain that no science teacher (or anyone else, for that matter) said to you, "I have a very, very important principle of physics to tell you: if you do the same experiment in two different places, you'll get the same result!"  To put it in more concrete terms: your car works that same in front of your house and in front of Kol Tuv.  (For you non-Chicagoans, Kol Tuv is one of the most reliable kosher grocery stores in the world; no exaggeration.)  In any case, your reaction is probably much closer to "Duh!" then "WOW!"

In fact, however, these three statements are exactly the same.  Exactly.  If there was the slightest difference between the action and the reaction, then you would need a different kind of computer for home and for school.  If your car worked differently in front of Kol Tuv than your house, then momentum would not be conserved.  The technical details and the global consequences are one in the same.

The gemara (Bava Kama 57-58) relates perfectly reasonable facts:

  1. R' Dosa would declare as hefker anything that had been gleaned from his field.  R' Dosa would do that in case any of the ani'yim accidently picked up something that was not considered "leket"/gleanings.
  2. The tz'nuyim (modest/pious ones) would set aside money to automatically redeem produce taken from their 4th year vineyards (which must be eaten in Yerushalayim).  They did that to save anyone from coming to sin because of them.
Comes along R' Yochanan and tells us that R' Dosa and the tz'nuyim were doing the same thing.  The gemara there spends some time analyzing R' Yochanan's statement and its implications.  Knowing these are the same, in fact, has even broader application than the statements themselves.

The Derech HaShem says that unless you understand not only the topics in an area of research, but also their interrelationships, then you don't understand the topic.  Reality is quite the research topic, don't you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...