Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Spiritual Content of Wine

I was once having a discussion with someone about a certain hashkafic attitude I felt was logically required by the Torah.  She disagreed with the attitude.  What about the logical necessity?  "Oh, I don't feel bound by the rules of logic.", she demurred.  Ah.  As you might imagine, that was my last attempt at a conversation with her.  You don't agree with my conclusions; that's great, you can help me to correct my thinking.  You think I am missing data; cool, you can educate me.  Can't quite put your finger on it, but something seems amiss; ok, let's talk about it.  Think that logic is irrelevant; you're patur from mitzvos, so there's point in further discussion.

I hold this truth to be self-evident: there is much more to this world than what appears to our physical senses.  You are more than welcome to disagree (though if you did, it is unlikely that you'd be reading this), but that is the stage for today's TftD.  Shi'urei Da'as (the Telshe Rosh Yeshiva) explains that it's not so much that there is a spiritual world and a physical world, but that our senses are geared to perceive our surroundings in a physical way.  Something like the difference between observing the world with your eyes vs an infrared sensor.  You don't see different things, you just see the same things differently.

S'farim tell us that the physicality of Adam and Chava before the sin was something like our spirituality.  Not a different world, the same world viewed much differently.  That is one of the things that makes leaning about  those times so tricky.  The words are the same, but our perception of those things is so vastly altered that we must constantly and consciously adjust our understanding to be aligned with the reality being presented.

The G"ra on mishlei gives us an example.  Chazal tell us, "mi'sh'nichnas yayin, yotzei sod" -- when wine goes in, secrets come out.  I don't need Chazal to tell me that when people get drunk their inhibitions are lowered and all sorts of things spill out.  I do need Chazal to reveal the inner meaning of that phenomenon: yayin is spelled yud-yud-nun, which stands for Y'rei'im (fear/reverence born of clarity), Y'sharim (righteous in conduct bein adam l'chaveiro), and N'vi'im (prophets).  That is, y'rei'im, y'sharim, and n'vi'im are the vehicle by which HaShem reveals Himself in the world.  Wine used appropriately opens the door to yirah, yashrus, and n'vu'ah.  Used the wrong way, of course, it just leads to foolishness.

Perhaps with this we can better understand what happened No'ach after the flood.  No'ach craved closeness with HaShem and used wine as the vehicle.  That would have been appropriate in the world he left, but in the new world -- one of much decreased spirituality -- the result was tragically different.  Same wine, but now wrapped in grosser physicality.  No'ach's mistake was to not account for that change.

That, then, is why it is so important to learn Torah from g'dolim.  They, and they alone, are equipped to translate -- each generation according to its level -- d'var HaShem into lashon b'nei adam.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...