Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Why We Believe and Observe Toras Moshe

R' Eliezer Aron, shlita, besides being a talmid chacham, has a very quick smile and is very gracious about listening to my chidushei torah.  I was very excited about the S'porno's explanation of what HaShem meant when He told Moshe that Klal Yisrael would believe in Toras Moshe forever (as discussed here) and so I made a bee line for R' Aron when I saw him.  Gracious as ever, R' Aron told me, "You must learn the Rambam, eighth perek of hilchos y'sodei hatorah.  You will not be sorry."  I did and I am not.  I figured you wouldn't mind hearing about it, either.

The Rambam there lays down a profound principle of our way of life and discusses a few of its implications.  The Rambam says that we do not believe in any prophet because of the miracles he performs nor the knowledge he possesses.  Those factors are completely irrelevant to belief.  So why do we believe in Toras Moshe?  Ma'amad Har Sinai, where we all experienced (for some brief moments) that same level of direct connection with the ein sof that Moshe Rabeinu experienced for the rest of his life in this world.  Once we all saw and experienced with Moshe, we had absolute knowledge about the veracity and clarity of the Torah that Moshe was teaching us.  Any disagreement with Toras Moshe is just silly.  Imagine you had an important discussion with your father and he wrote you a note summarizing the discussion; which you both reviewd and agreed that you had clarity on the discussion and its summary.  Then, years later, after you have been living according to that discussion, someone sees part of the note and says, "Oh!  I think you misunderstood."  Silly.

Says the Rambam, the reason we believe prophets who perform certain signs is not because of the signs, but because Toras Moshe tells us that is how we determine the veracity of a prophet.  At that point, they could be doing magic of sleight of hand; its irrelevant.  Similarly, we are willing to even kill someone based on the proper testimony of two witnesses; whether what they are saying is true or not.  Toras Moshe says to act on the testimony of two witnesses, so we do.  Even if we later discover that the witnesses could not have possibly seen the crime (as in the case of eidim zomemim) about which they testified.  (That may be why eidim zomemim upon whose testimony the court issued a death sentence, are not punished after the fact.)

That is definitely the biggest benefit of sharing divrei torah... you get more divrei torah!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...