Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: ציצית -- The Tie That Binds

Check out this out!
 הלכות ציצית סימן יא
סעיף יג, סוף ס''ק סד, שער ציון (*): עיין בא''ע סימן קכה ס''ד בט''ז סק''י דמחמיר שם, ואולי לענין תולמ''ה כל שהוא עושה מעשה הצריכה לעצם ההכשר. ועיין סוכה יא

I know, I know... brings tears to your eyes, right?  What's that?  You want some context?  Ah; good point.  Allow me to elaborate.

You would think that hilchos ציצית would be simple to the point of being nearly boring.  Ho-hum, four cornered garment, ho-hum eight threads, ho-hum five knots, ho-hum some windings between the knots.  I mean, we don't even have תכלת any more  (despite the blue threads you see intermingled in some people's ציצית; not really forbidden, but also not really תכלת). Sure there are some details in how big the garment needs to be, how long the threads need to be, what materials are good, etc.  Normal stuff.

Here's the complication: תעשה ולא מן העשוי (affectionately known by its abbreviation: תולמ''ה)/threads must be transformed into ציצית on the garment; it is no good to have ציצית just appear fully made on the corner of a garment.  For example, imagine tying a beautiful set of tassels on a tiny square of  wool (they are not ציצית because they aren't attached to a garment large enough to require ציצית ), then sewing that square onto a regular sized tallis.  You would have to actually untie them are start again because of תולמ''ה.  Another example: You tie your threads onto the very edge of a tallis  (not "one the corner" but halichically under the corner), then sew more edging on the tallis to make those tassells at the regulation distance from the edge.  Again, you would have to actually untie them are start again because of תולמ''ה.

Before the next case, please note that even though we make five knots and lots of windings, but to fulfill the Torah obligation one only need make one set of windings and one knot to hold them in place.  Ok, here we go: you take one really, really long thread and run it four times through a hole in corner of a tallis, then you take the end and make one set of windings, but still haven't tied a knot after the winding (so they will unwind if you let go).  With me?  Now technically, this is probably not a halachic ציצית, but it's uncomfortably close.  Now you decide to cut where the threads are doubled back to the garment -- transforming, presto chango -- one thread into eight (ie, four doubled through the hole).  So... can you continue tying those threads into ציצית, or have you already crossed a line and need to start all over again because of תולמ''ה?

The Mishna Brura (סעיף יג, סוף ס''ק סד) is lenient, but nervously refers you to many who are stringent.  I don't want to ruin your surprise, but upon following the references in that footnote, you will find a discussion of writing a get (if a drop of ink falls on the parchment, then you dip your quill in to draw it into a letter -- is that called an act or writing, or do you have to start over?), a pit in a public thoroughfare (if one person digs the pit and leaves it uncovered, then another uses it and also leaves it uncovered -- who is responsible for damages: does the act of using it make it a new pit and the second guy is responsible, or is the first guy still responsible since he started it?), and a sukkah (if you schach is too high, then you lower it or raise the floor -- does that work or do you have to start over?)

Two things. (1) If you even learn hilchos ציצית correctly, you are going to be learning כל התורה כולו/the entire Torah.  (2) The Mishna Brura did just that... which is why the Mishna Brura has the exalted status that it does.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק