Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Lifnei Iver wrt/ Doctors on Shabbos

 "וְלִפְנֵ֣י עִוֵּ֔ר לֹ֥א תִתֵּ֖ן מִכְשֹׁ֑ל" (Do not put a stumbling block in front of a blind person.)
-- Vayikra 19:14
This seems to be a unique verse in the Torah, as the simple meaning of the words are not at all the meaning of this statement.  In fact, suppose someone actually puts a stumbling block in front of a blind person.  We may not give him shishi (or even, nebach chamishi) on Shabbos, but he has not violated a Torah offense.  If the blind person actually stumbles and suffers damages, of course, he is obligated to pay those damages; that's a separate matter.

What the verse does mean, though (as Rashi notes), is that one is not allowed to give misleading advice to a Jew who has no insight into the issue at hand.  For example, a life insurance salesman has two different policies to sell and he makes a larger commision on one of them.  If he encourages his clients to buy the policy that make more money for him -- even though the other policy would actually be better for the client -- then the salesman is transgressing the issur d'oraisa of lifnei iver lo si'tein michshol.  That's obvious, but there are more subtle examples also.

Suppose a storekeeper is known to overcharge by more than a sixth; he is certainly not allowed to to do that, but that's the situation.  You need something that he carries and his is the closest store.  You need the gizzy right now and don't feel like going across town to save 47 cents, so you are 100% mochel b'leiv malei his overcharges.  Even so, you shouldn't patronize his store because you are encouraging him to continue his evil ways; thus transgressing lifnei iver.  R' Moshe says that rosh yeshivos have to be on guard; if a talmid comes to his rosh yeshivah to discuss leaving, the rosh yeshiva needs to be certain he is giving advice that is best for the talmid rather than best for the yeshiva.

Now we come to doctors on Shabbos.  Suppose a person needs to go to the hospital on Shabbos and has has a choice to use either a frum or non-frum (but Jewish, obviously) doctor.  The two doctors are the best in their field and are equally competent.  In that case it is better to use the frum doctor.  The frum doctor will be doing a mitzvah of piku'ach nefesh and v'chai ba'hem; he therefore has permission to violate Shabbos.  Regarding the non-frum doctor, though, the Beis haLeivi says that since he has no regard for Shabbos anyway and he is only going for his parnassa, he therefore has not permission to violate the Shabbos.  In shamayim he will be charged with the same crime of violating Shabbos whether it is for a mitzvah or not; when we have the Sanhedrin (may it be soon and in our days), he would be chayiv misa.  Therefore to ask the non-frum doctor is a violation of lifnei iver.

If the non-frum doctor is better, of course, then the patient can and should ask him.  The lifnei iver violation does not preclude him for seeking the best medical attention for his condition.  Suppose, though, that they are equally competent, but the patient thinks that using a non-frum doctor is better because he fears the frum doctor will be so concerned about Shabbos that he'll compromise the treatment.  In that case (assuming it is his own mishagos), then the patient would be transgressing lifnei iver to call the non-frum doctor.  Interestingly, suppose the frum doctor says, "Call the non-frum guy, I feel like spending Shabbos with my family."  In that case, the frum doctor is transgressing lifnei iver.

R' Fuerst commented on that last case, "Being a doctor is almost as bad as being a Rav; when you get a knock on the door at 3:30AM, you have to answer it."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…