Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Eiruv Tavshilin, Rosh Chodesh, and Purim

I am, b'ezrash HaShem, going to tell you why you don't need an eiruv tavshilin when rosh chodesh or Purim fall on erev Shabbos.  Personally, I think the answer will be more meaning full if I first tell you why you would even think such a thing in the first place.  After all, you are probably just now wondering that.  In case, though, you've been wondering about this for eons I don't want to increase your distress by making you wait even another two paragraphs.  Hmm... ok:
--- SPOILER ALERT ---
Because there is no chiyuv s'uda (rosh chodesh), and we don't make g'zeiros on g'zeiros (Purim)
--- END SPOILER ALERT ---

For those of you who are left... The Shulchan Aruch 525:14, says that you should make the eiruv tavshilin mamash erev Yom Tov, but you are fine even if you make the eiruv tavshilin on one Yom Tov for a later Yom Tov (as long as the eiruv is still good to eat after all that time; smoked fish or whatnot).  The Mishna Brura explains that there are two reasons given as to the purpose of the eiruv tavshilin.  Rav Ashi says it is so your preparations on yom tov sheini are a continuation of the preparations done before the holiday started.  Rava says it is so you choose something nice for Shabbos before you get so wrapped up in simchas yom tov that you eat up all the goodies.  We pasken like Rav Ashi, so that's why you can make an eiruv tavshilin any time before the holiday.  L'chat'chila, however, we like to cover our bases and perform the mitzvah in such a way that Rava's reason is also covered; that, of course, is the reason to make the eiruv tavshilin mamash erev Yom Tov.

Now comes the fun part.  According to Rava's reason, the issur malacha is irrelevant (a red herring, if you will).  The problem he is addressing is related to you getting all wrapped up in the simcha and eating... which happens also with rosh chodesh and Purim.  Cool, eh?  We pasken like Rav Ashi, but why wouldn't Rava have required an eiruv tavshilin in those cases.  And since the Shulchan Aruch wants us to be choshess for Rava l'chatchila.  So what gives?

The Sha'agas Aryeh addresses the rosh chodesh issue.  Namely, while there is an issur to fast on rosh chodesh, there is no chiyuv s'uda per se.  Given that the chiyuv is not there, we are not worried about forgetting Shabbos.  It seems we are only worried about forgetting Shabbos when we are involved with fulfilling another mitzvah; just stahm eating a nice meal won't make us forget Shabbos.  That doesn't explain Purim, however.  Others want to say that since you can do malacha on Rosh Chodesh, Chazal weren't worried about forgetting Shabbos... you could always make something or run out to the store before Shabbos starts.  That, of course, also explains Purim.

How would the Sha'agas Aryeh explain Rava's not requiring an eiruv tavshilin before Purim that falls on erev Shabbos?  One could say, Chazal did not add decrees to decrees -- ein gozrin g'zeira l'g'zeira.  That's my value added... so it's particularly chaviv to me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc