Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Ein Sof Can't Be Imperfect

Here's the "sting" we used to run in college.  We'd find someone who claimed to believe in G-d; either they owned a bible or went to catholic high school (we had one in each category when I was in the dorms).  We'd ask him/her, "So... according to you G-d can do anything, right?"  Of course he/she would agree; usally with conviction since they enjoyed the opportunity to demonstrate how faithful they were.  Then we'd ask, "So can G-d make a rock so heavy that He can't move it?"  Yes or no, it was another victory for the atheists.  We'd celebrate with much laughter and have another beer.  (It doesn't take much to get the intelligentsia in the dorms to laugh and drink beer.)

The question itself, of course, is built on a false premise.  Our poor victim was lost once he/she agreed that G-d could to anything.  G-d, in fact, cannot do anything.  Don't be shocked; I'm still wearing my yarmulka and tzitzis.  The correct assertion, as I learned from a shiur by R' Dr. Dovid Gottlieb of Ohr Sameyach is that G-d can do anything that is not a contradiction to His perfection.  That's step one.  The second step in answering the challenge is that the question is not well formed.  Let's go through that in more detail.

Here are some more things that G-d can't do.  He can't be surprised.  He can't learn something new.  Even better.  Suppose you want to play chess with G-d. Since He's G-d, He'll spot you some pieces; He'll keep just His king, you get to keep all your pieces.  G-d can't win that game of chess.  Maybe you'll push back: maybe there is some way he can figure out a way to make things different enough so He can win.  Maybe, but then He's not playing chess anymore.  (I used that as a way to explain how the reform religion is just not Judaism; see here, if you like.)  Bottom line, though... G-d can't do anything.

Now for step two.  Suppose I ask you if G-d can make a square circle.  The answer is: You haven't asked a question.  Yes, it has all the right parts of speech, but it carries no content.  (Politicians use this all the time to talk a long time without conveying information.)  I don't know what a square circle is, so I can't say if G-d can do it or not.  Since I have already "admitted" (actually, "asserted") that there are lots of things G-d can't do, you can't say that the definition doesn't matter; as he could have done when our victim (aka, "mark") fell into the trap of saying G-d can do anything.

The original question, therefore, is something like asking if the guy who programmed Super Mario can create a rock in the game that he, the programmer, can't move.  The answer is that "an object in the game that the programmer can't move" is basically a square circle; there is no such thing.

I know some people think that slowing down, being careful with arguments and assumptions, and sticking to the facts takes all the fun out of these discussions.  I have found that watching the frustration of people who think that way to be a much more satisfying dimension of fun, actually.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…