Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Lo Ba'Shamayim Hi; Even Angels Need a P'sak from the Gadol HaDor

One of the most frustrating experiences I had with my rav, R' Dovid Siegel, shlita, started when I asked the rav a detail I wasn't getting on a simple gemara.  What made it frustrating was that the rav went to look up the gemara.  I mean, it was a well known gemara that I was sure he had seen a hundred times; besides, I had given the rav the relevant facts.  I just needed a quick answer.  Fine; I got the gemara for the rav.  Next was even more unbelievable... the rav started reading the gemara as if it was the first time seeing it!  Reading from the beginning, getting context, even checking Rashi's!  Finally, finally the rav was getting to the point upon which my question revolved.  I listened patiently (more or less) as the rav learned up the gemara; then I blanched as I realized my question was based on a mistake in how I had read the gemara.  There was no question...

I have turned that frustrating experience into a life lesson.  I strive to never get p'shat based on something that someone says over.  If I have a question, I go back to the source and learn it up.  That hanhaga came in very useful this morning when a good friend and talmid chacham wanted to tell me a nice vort on a gemara based on a Chidushei haRim on parshas Va'yeira.  His vort was good, but the Chidushei haRim didn't make any sense to me.  He directed me to where he had seen it; Mayanei shel Torah; a very cool little and unassuming set of s'farim with a beautiful collection of chidushim on chumash.  I am so glad I looked it up!

Three angels came to Avraham Avinu after his bris mila; one to heal him (Rafael), one to destroy S'dom (Gavriel), and one to give him the good news about Sara Imeinu's impending pregnancy and birth (Cronkitel or Jor-El or another one... not sure).  Three m'alachim because there were three jobs; an angel can only have one job; as Rashi notes on the spot.  The issue is that Rafael is then sent on to save Lot. What?!  How can he have two jobs?

Says the Chidushei haRim, Lot was only saved in order that David haMelech could come from Mo'av.  Hang on... a Mo'avi can't convert because of they didn't offer sustenance to Klal Yisrael as they left Mitzrayim.  Ah... but a Mo'avis can convert; because it is not in consonance with the requirements of tznius for the women to go out to greet strangers.  Therefore there is no complaint against the women of Mo'av and they can convert; as Rus, in fact, did.  How do we know the halacha that a Mo'avis can convert?  From Sara Imeinu and Avraham Avinu.  However -- and this is the punch line -- that halacha was not paskened until the angels asked Avraham Avinu where Sara Imeinu was and he answered, "In the tent."  In other words, their hanaga of tznius and greeting guests was what established the halacha.  Before that issue was clarified it was not known if Lot was to be saved or not!  Now that Avraham Avinu had paskened, a new mission (to save Lot) was created.  Rafael had been on his way home after curing Avraham Avinu, so he could now be given that freshly created mission.  (I mean, he was already there, after all.)

There's a lot going on in the morning at the vasikin minyan; it's worth getting up.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more