Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Staying Above Suspicion Even From Scoffers

There is a very funny halacha by Chanuka licht in Eretz Yisrael where the lights need to visible to the passing public  (as opposed to chutz la'aretz where the Rema paskens that it is not necessary, though the Mishna Brura says its a nice thing... ok... I think I've covered my bases).  If you have two openings that cannot both be seen at the same time from the outside (eg, there are on two sides of your house and they face two different streets), then you need to light in both openings so that people who don't know that both openings are to one household will not have reason to suspect that one household didn't light.  Curious, because it's a strange suspicion; wouldn't you expect that people are required to give you the benefit of the doubt?  Curiouser, because if the candles go out you are not (mi'ikar ha'din) required to relight them (though it is recommended that you do).  That means that we are only worried about the suspicion for the first few moments when everyone is lighting.  Halichos Shlomo explains that this extra level of care is required davka because the mitzvah is for "pisuma nisa"/publicizing the miracle.  If you want people to take notice, you have to scrupulous in your behavior... even things that are tangential to your intent.

Parshas Toldos (B'reishis 25:19)begins:
וְאֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת יִצְחָק, בֶּן-אַבְרָהָם:  אַבְרָהָם הוֹלִיד אֶת-יִצְחָק:
These are the generations of Yitzchak son of Avraham.  Avraham caused Yitzchak to be born.  Sorry for the stilted translation, but we need that to get a good grasp of what the Torah wants to tell us.  The question is obvious: Given that Yitzchak is a son of Avraham, obviously Avraham caused Yitzchak to be born.  That answer is equally obvious:  Until the Torah referred to Yitzchak as "ben Avraham", I knew he was Avraham's son.  Telling me that Yitzchak is Avraham's son is like someone on a job interview announcing, out of the blue, with no prompting, "I am not a crook!"  That only begs the question: So... why would I have thought that you were a crook?  And that's the real question: Why did the Torah need to stress that Yitzchak was Avrham's son?  What would I have thought?

On that question, Rashi gives two answers.  The Torah wants to stress that Avraham -- not Avram -- was the father of Yitzchak.  Hence: It was the work that Avraham, who worked so hard to raise himself from Avram to Avraham, had done that produced the setting that brought Yitzchak into the world.  I need to know that to emphasize this is no ordinary biological event; this is a spiritual event.

Alternatively, Avraham -- not Avimelech -- was the father of Avraham.  Since Yitzchak produced a tzadik and a rasha, the scoffers of that generation used that as proof that Avimelech was Yitzchak's father; the tzadik coming from Sarah, the rasha from Avimelech.  HaShem therefore ensured that Yitzchak had physically identical features to Avraham as proof of his paternity.

HaShem didn't refrain from creating the sun, moon, and stars even though people would make a mistake and serve them.  HaShem said, "Let us make man", even though people could make a mistake and think there is more than One in control.  But let the scoffers of the generation have second thoughts about His beloved Avraham?!  His Avraham, whom he asked (cf Rashi to B'reishis 22:2) to please stand up to the nisayon of Akeidas Yitzchak so He would have what to answer the umos ha'olam?!  No way!

There's a lesson there somewhere....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...