Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Learning How Much of Tzitzis Making Needs To Be Lishma from Korban Pesach

I was once walking with a young tzurba d'rabanan and I commented that something he said was not in accordance with the Mishna Brura.  He replied, "There are other poskim besides the Mishna Brura."  I am sure this is painfully (literally, I fear) obvious to all; I am not at all good about keeping my mouth shut.  That time, however, I showed uncharacteristic restraint and discipline.  Actually, I was probably just in shock and realized that I wouldn't even know where to begin.  Between you and me, however...

I know there are other poskim.  As it turns out, of course, the Mishna Brura also knew that.  He also knew all of those poskim, plus more, plus had a deep understanding of the gemaras.  So I read a few poskim myself and draw my own conclusions, or I can take advantage of the Mishna Brura's uncanny grasp of kol ha'torah kula.  Moreover, when learning more recent poskim, it is clear as day that they treat the Mishna Brura with special reverence.  When I had cancer, I let my doctor in consultation with the hospital medical board plan my treatment.  That's just for my life in this world; obviously for my eternal soul I am even more cautious!

What brought this up was learning a long Biur Halacha on a seemingly minor (though important) detail in making the strings for tzitzis.  In order to become tzitzis strings, the sheared wool must be: carded (m'nafeitz), spun (tavui), and twisted (shazur).  Everyone agrees that the spinning must me done with the specific intent to produce the strings used to make tzitzis as HaShem has commanded; aka "lishma".  The quite long Biur Halacha (Siman 11, syef 2, d.h. lishmahn) addresses whether the twisting needs to be done lishma.  He first demonstrates that the poskim who say that the tzitzis strings don't even (b'di'avad, mind you) need twisting are off the mainstream and one may not rely on them at all.  He also demonstrates conclusively that they definitely should be twisted lishmah and that making them with specific intent that they not be used for tzitzis strings certainly renders them pasul, even b'di'avad.  What's left?  "Stam da'as"; that is, can we rely (at least b'di'avad) on the general principle that "kol ha'oseh al da'as ha'rishon oseh"/all that is done in a process is done according to the intent expressed at the beginning of the process?  The reason there is a question is because this is two processes (albeit done by one person), spinning followed by twisting.  Can we, for a d'oraisa requirement, extend that principle to include a second process (twisting) that is a follow up to another process (spinning) that was done with proper original intent.

The Biur Halacha answer, "Why... yes, you can."; based on a gemara in Z'vachim (animal sacrifices).  Oh, surely he means a gemara about tzitzis that happens to be in masechta Z'vachim, right?  No, sir; he means a gemara about shechting and receiving the blood of the korban pesach.  Eh?  The cases are actually precisely parallel: a process that has a pasuk requiring lishma (spinning vs. shechting) followed by a process that is not explicitly required to be lishma (twisting vs. receiving the blood); the gemara concludes that "kol ha'oseh al da'as ha'rishon oseh" does, in fact, apply even when it is two processes (but done by one person).

That Bi'ur Halacha is a whole shiur on how to read poskim, how to resolve contradictions in poskim, how much weight to give to a p'sak by different poskim, and even how to take apart a gemara.

So next time someone says, "There are other poskim besides the Mishna Brura," ask him if he's learned that Biur Halacha.  When he says "no" (because if the answer were "yes" he never would have made that comment in the first place), just be quiet.  Trust me, it's not worth your breath.  Besides, I'll motzi you... I still can't keep my mouth shut.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...