Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Socrates Is My New Role Model for the Bracha of שלא עשני גוי

No list of great thinkers of the Western World could possibly elide Socrates. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, Socrates fundamental convictions included:
  • human wisdom begins with the recognition of one’s own ignorance
  • the unexamined life is not worth living
  • ethical virtue is the only thing that matters
Those, even from a Torah perspective, are laudable ideals. It is widely accepted that the trial that led to his conviction and execution was politically motivated. Socrates challenged the status quo -- not with weapons, but with ideas. Socrates lectured in public to get people to open their minds and think. As far as his actual execution, this is how Google Gemini phases it:
Socrates' execution, while controversial, elevated his status as a martyr for philosophy and intellectual freedom. He chose death over exile or compromise, solidifying his legacy as a symbol of unwavering commitment to truth and reason.

He certainly is admirable, and that assessment has stood the test of time. I recently became aware of Socrates' triple filter test for whether or not to accept or even listen a report about someone else:

  1. The first filter is truth. Are you absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?
  2. The second filter, the filter of goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my friend something that’s good?
  3. The third filter, the filter of usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my friend going to be useful for me?
Socrates concluded: If what you want to say is not verifiably true (either you saw it yourself or you have investigated and found reliable evidence), not something good about the other person, not useful to me or the other person... then why do you want to say it?

Not bad! When I first heard this, I thought about our own rules about לשון הרע/slander and רכילות/gossip. Sefer Chafetz Chaim (on which I give a weekly shiur -- let me know if you would like to join) lists five rules/filters that need to be passed to allow saying something. The three of Socrates, plus these additional two:
  1. Could the same benefit be realized without having to say the  לשון הרע/slander or רכילות/gossip?
  2. Is the would-be speaker acting out of pure motives? He only wants to protect and help; he has no personal grudge against the person one whose behavior he would like to report.
The first of those speaks to how profoundly we want to avoid negative speech. After all, the ability to speak is the trait that distinguishes us from the animals. Speech, therefore, is something holy. The last "filter" means that even if the other four are solid, this person cannot be the one to make the report. Harboring resentment or hatred against another Jew is just too powerful to allow any expression at all.

Let's take one more step: Among the nations, only a Socrates is expected to live up to such lofty standards. For Klal Yisrael, on the other hand, these are not considered lofty standards, these are הלכה למעשה -- rules by which even the most simple Jew lives.

Every morning, even knowing that the nations can produce a Socrates, I am so proud and inspired to be a member of Klal Yisrael and to sincerely thank the Creator שלא עשני גוי.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...