Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Planets and Other Celestial Objects Are Alive and Aware

When looking into the night sky, besides the moon (and the occasional man-made satellites), you are seeing two realms: the fixed stars and the planets. (Yes, I know there are also comets and meteors. Let's focus on the horses before jumping to zebras.) The fixed stars, so called because their position in the sky never changes; if you know your position on the earth and the time of day, you can find any fixed star. The realm of the fixed stars is called the celestial sphere (there is some history behind that designation; not for now). The planets -- which is Greek for "wanderers" -- wander around the sky. (Feel free to Google any of those or sign up for Overview of Physical Sciences that I plan to teach some time in the future at HTC, בעזרת השם.)

The word מַזָל actually means "constellation." (By the way, Google translate is so sure you want the common usage --"luck" or "fortune" -- that I had to play some tricks to finally get the literal translation.) In my world of physics and astronomy, constellations are visual groupings of stars in the celestial sphere. As it turns out, planets are also in the מַזָל category. After clarifying that with R' Klausner this morning, one of the yungaleit in the kollel asked me if I had graduated to kabala now. Nope, I said, it's a Rambam.

All of the celestial objects (הכוכבים והגלגלים) are intelligent beings that are alive and well (חיים ועומדים). They are aware of their Creator, and each -- according to its level and understanding -- praises its creator, just as the angels do. Just as they are aware of their Creator, they are also self-aware and aware of the angels above them. Their level of intellect and understanding is below the angels, but above that of human beings.

Yep... not kabala at all; plain, bread and butter Rambam. Not "Guide for the Perplexed", but Mishna Torah. About as non-kabala as you can get. The great rationalist whose words and ideas have too often been co-opted by the non-Torah world. I guess they ignore the parts that make them feel uncomfortable. Shocking.

But, but... you may stammer... we know that planets and stars are just inanimate objects -- big rocks of varying temperature -- traversing the universe according to the laws of physics. Right? I mean, we do know that, right?

I hate to break your bubble (that's a lie, of course, I seek bubbles to break and take great glee in their destruction): First of all, before you worry whether the planets have free will, you should ask yourself if you have free will. Free will is a straight on contradiction to the modern scientific world. It is a known problem. It is also a mostly ignored problem. Some scientists nowadays want to address the problem by saying that even though there is no free will, we don't feel that, so we feel like we have free will and that is just as good. I am not joking here. Real, respected scientists say that. Feel free to type "is free will a contradiction to the laws of physics" into your favorite AI tool. You will get a lengthy answer that boils down to "yes, but it's ok because...."

But, but, what about inertia? You don't need planets to be living, willful creatures, all you need is the law of inertia (aka Newton's First Law of Motion): an object in motion will tend to stay in motion unless acted on by an external force. Right?

So... why do objects continually move? Because of inertia. Uh-huh... and what is inertia? Who is policing all those rocks and enforcing this law? Just let that idea sit in your mind for a while and you will realize that we (post-Newton) say: celestial objects just move because they do; that's the law. The Rishonim (pre-Newton) say: the celestial objects move because they are aware of their Creator and that's how they praise Him.

Inertia doesn't sound so much as an explanation as an abdication, does it? Right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...